Video: Dr. Anthony Fauci, Former Director of the NIAID, Testified before Congress on Monday, June 03, 2024

Washington D.C - Dr. Anthony Fauci, the Former Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and Chief of the NIAID Laboratory of Immunoregulation, as well as having a position of Chief Medical Advisor to President Joe Biden, testified on Monday June 03, 2024, before House of Representatives at the Committee on Oversight and Accountability.

Dr. Anthony Fauci appeared before the House Oversight Committee and was his first testimony since his retirement on December 01, 2022, as the Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID).

Dr. Anthony Fauci was sworn in at the hearing an provided about a roughly a 6 minute opening statement and then he took questions.  We did not review the whole testimony of Dr. Fauci, but within 15 minutes Dr. Fauci appeared to have lied and/or changed his story several times.

Dr. Fauci stated that he worked had worked at the National Institute of Health (NIH) for 54 years and been a director at NIAID for more that 38 years.  Dr. Fauci stated during his tenure he had dealt with and was deeply involved in scientific and public health responses of several infectious disease outbreaks, whereas he claimed his involvement in government service to include AIDs, Ebola HIV, Pandemic Flu, and the Zika virus, (a mosquito-borne infection).

Dr. Anthony Fauci continued to state, that under his leadership, NIAID and he were well positioned to respond to the Covid-19 virus. Dr. Anthony Fauci then claimed that NIAID had invested billions of dollars on mRNA technology and imaging design for nearly two decades, whereas Fauci stated both of these things had lead us to the swift development of vaccines for Covid-19.  Dr. Anthony Fauci stated in less than 11 months after the identification of novel virus (Covid-19), a safe and highly effective vaccines were widely available for Covid-19.

We here at Peer Reviewed Politics disagree with what Dr. Anthony Fauci is claiming at this hearing about the vaccines being safe and highly effective.  There are now tons of research up to now, which shows the novel vaccine may have likely done way more harm, then it did good.  Even Doctor Robert Malone, who help develop this vaccine, was worried about its efficacy and its affects on humans.  Even the in CDC in internal documents reveals and found evidence in late 2021 that Covid-19 vaccines were causing multiple deaths.

Dr. Anthony Fauci appeared to be postulating in his opening statement and complaining about how his actions had been distorted.  Dr. Fauci then spoke about the possibility of SARS-CoV-2 had resulted from a lab leak.  Dr. Anthony Fauci stated that he was alerted by a phone call from some several highly respected health and scientific professionals on January 31, 2020 and he provided the names of the officials in his testimony.  Dr. Fauci stated that these officials were all concerned about the SARS-CoV-2 Gnome sequence, which he stated the Gnome Sequence had suggested that the virus may have been manipulated in a lab.

Dr. Anthony Fauci then states that he had participated in a conference call the next day with about a dozen international virologists to discussed this possibility vs. a spill over from an animal reservoir.  Dr. Anthony Fauci stated that the discussions were lively, and Dr. Fauci stated that there were an arguments for both possibilities.  Dr. Fauci then claimed that two participants who supposedly testified in a hearing, stated that Dr. Fauci did not try to stir the discussion in any one direction.  It should be noted here, Dr. Fauci did not in this oversight hearing elaborate on who brought up the idea of a spill over analogy during this conference call, either.

Dr, Fauci stated that it was decided in the conference call, that several participants would more carefully study the Gnome sequence, but again Dr. Fauci did not elaborate on who these so-called participants were in his testimony at this oversight hearing.

Dr. Fauci then stated that several of these participants who studied the Gnome sequence, which were original concerned about the Gnome sequence of SARS-CoV-2 of being manipulated had later changed their minds and concluded that most likely the outcome was from a spill over.  Dr. Fauci continued to state the participants did kept an open mind, but again Dr. Fauci didn't elaborate who these participants were.  Dr. Fauci did say that these participants did appropriately published their opinions in peer reviewed literature.

Dr. Fauci contended and maintained that he never tried to influence or get these scientist to change their minds by bribing them with millions of dollars of grant money.  Dr. Fauci said he had no input into the content being published in papers, (The peer reviewed literature).  Dr. Fauci also denies that he had tried to cover up the possibility that this virus was from a lab.

Dr. Fauci then stated it was inconceivable that any who reads his e-mail could conclude that he was trying to cover up the possibility of a lab leak.  Dr. Fauci again stated that he was keeping an open mind to the cause.  Dr Fauci then denied that he had anything to do with Senior Advisor Dr. David Morens because of Dr. Morens' title.  Dr. Fauci also claimed that he was never advised or knew of any actions by Dr. Morens related to Dr. Peter Daszak, Ecohealth or Dr. Morens' e-mails.

We here at Peer Review Politics noted Dr. Fauci made a lot of what you would call, "straw man claims" by like using the term "they", except in this case, Fauci called them "participants", which is basically a no name blame game.  Dr. Fauci never names the people he is referring to, the exception when he does is when its is to his benefit or he is trying to avoid being tied into that person.  In his opening statement Dr. Fauci names of several people who believed there was Gnome manipulation, but later in his testimony Dr. Fauci doesn't name the individuals in the phone conference, which the participants supposedly talked about the spill over effect.

Dr. Fauci does not have a problem naming Dr. Morens, Ecohealth, and Dr. Peter Daszak, since it appears Dr. Fauci is trying to dissociate himself from Dr. Morens by saying he was not an advisor on institute policies or to other substantive issues.  Dr. Fauci only stated that had Dr. Morens helped Dr. Fauci in writing some scientific papers.  Dr, Fauci went on to tell the oversight committee that he had never conducted official business by personal e-mail, either.  We here at Peer Reviewed Politics do remember that Dr. Fauci originally denied the lab leak, but for some reason now he acts like he said nothing like this at all.

The Ranking Member Dr. Ruiz questioned and defended Dr. Fauci after Chairman Dr. Wenstrup had questioned Dr. Fauci after Dr. Fauci made his opening statement.  Ranking Member Dr. Ruiz then tried to make it appear Chairman Dr. Wenstrup and Republicans were on a witch hunt and were vilifying Dr. Fauci.  The Ranking member then tried to inject that Republicans came up empty handed in the subcommittee about Dr. Fauci having knowledge or that Republican can't prove Fauci was behind the funding of the 'Gain of Function' research that was being done in Wuhan, China.

Ranking Member Dr. Ruiz then stated that the subcommittee has heard three different definitions of 'Gain of Function' research. Ranking Member Dr. Ruiz continued to claim that Republicans had relied heavily on an overly broad definition that had no regulatory significance.  Ranking Member Dr. Ruiz even tries to claim that the Republican definition is so broad that the definition of 'Gain of Function' research even includes the manufacture of flu vaccines.  Ranking Member Dr. Ruiz then claims that NIH uses the definition provided in regulations to determine if it is or is not 'Gain of Function' research and then Dr. Ruiz stated that witness after witness has reminded the subcommittee that NIH refers to regulations for the definition of 'Gain of Function' research.

Ranking Member Dr. Ruiz then proceeds to then ask Dr. Fauci about the regulatory definition of 'Gain of Function' research according to the 'P3CO' policy and then asks Dr. Fauci according to the regulatory definitions in P3CO, did NIH ever fund 'Gain of Function' research in Wuhan, China?

Dr. Fauci started to answers Ranking Member Dr. Ruiz question, but then started stuttering, then state as you said congressman.  Dr. Fauci then elaborated, "According to regulatory and operative definition of P3CO, NIH did not fund 'Gain of Function' research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology."

Ranking Member Dr. Ruiz then thanks Dr. Fauci for repeating the so-called NIH P3CO policy definition for the committee to hear.  Ranking Member Dr. Ruiz then referencing that Dr. Fauci had been consistent about this since the beginning of the pandemic and that Dr. Fauci had spoke about applying a definition found in the regulation of the P3CO frame work.  Ranking Member Dr. Ruiz then asked Dr. Fauci if this was correct.  Dr. Fauci replied, "That is Correct."  Ranking Member Dr. Ruiz then said that Dr. Fauci had made this clear his 2021 Senate testimony.

For some reason this rang a bell in our memories, so we did some research here at Peer Reviewed Politics on the P3CO framework and we found an NSABB Meeting Minutes from September 21, 2022, which talks about the definition of 'Gain of Function' research was not well defined.

Just so everyone knows what these acronyms like P3CO mean, we have checked the definitions within the National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB) Meeting Minutes; it means Potential Pandemic Pathogen Care and Oversight (P3CO) and the acronym (PPP) means Potential Pandemic Pathogen and (ePPP) means enhanced Potential Pandemic Pathogen.

As stated, these acronyms were taken for the NSABB Meeting Minutes and so was this Paragraph 'Finding 3', which clearly states the current P3CO policy does not adequately incorporate the local review and oversight roles played by investigators and institutions in the development, review, and ongoing oversight of research.

These NSABB Meeting Minute's go on to make recommendations under 'Recommendation 3'., which again clearly states the USG P3CO framework should be revised to articulate specific roles, responsibilities, and expectations for investigators and institutions for or evaluation of research for potential involvement of ePPP's.  Local compliance procedures should be better harmonized, strengthened where needed and resourced.  A USG contact entity should be designated to assist investigators and institutions in the review process and to provide oversight to ensure adequate evaluation.

Note: the date of these NSABB Meeting Minutes at the bottom of page 5.  Clearly the date is September 21, 2022 for these meeting minutes and Dr. Fauci testified before the Senate on November 4, 2021.  This is almost a year after Fauci had testified, and supposedly made it clear to the Senate, but here in the Meeting Minutes of the NSABB, the P3CO was not clear as Dr, Fauci and Dr. Ruiz both have claimed.  Remember, Ranking Member Dr. Ruiz had just thanked Dr. Fauci for repeating the so-called NIH P3CO framework, which Ranking Member Dr. Ruiz then said Dr. Fauci had made the definition clear.  Both Dr. Fauci and Ranking Member Dr. Ruiz have made a false claim about Fauci's testimony in the Senate on November 04, 2021.  There was not a clear policy or framework for the definition of 'Gain of Function' research.  Its very clear in the NSABB Meeting Minutes that the P3CO framework were not clear.

The picture below is part of the outline of the NSABB Meeting Minutes document which is the minutes of National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB).  You can click on the picture to see the full NSABB Meeting Minutes document, which discusses the flaws in the definition of the P3CO framework, whereas these minutes were done virtually on September 21, 2022, well after the pandemic, after the Senate hearing, and well after the investigations had started to take place in to the 'Gain of Function' research.

Its clear Dr. Fauci also had changed his response about this being a lab leak too, when responded to Rep. Morgan Griffith’s (R-VA) questions related to the possibility of this being a lab leak, Dr. Fauci now states that he thought it was possible, but not with NIH funding because they had nothing to do with the lab leak. 

You can watch the hearing on June 03, 2024, where Dr. Fauci gets grilled by the Oversight Committee.  Its apparent that Dr. Fauci is lying and has changed his story from the Senate hearing on November 04, 2021 from not being a lab leak, to its possible it may have been a lab leak, but the NIH had nothing to do with it.

Watch the June 03, 2024 oversight hearing here, its called A Hearing with Dr. Anthony Fauci.

• Attribution: Peer Reviewed Politics™ | Media Attribution:  | Author(s): @Teapartier_Al on X.com - Oversight and Accountability Hearing | Date: Hearing on June 03, 2024 and Article Post on June 7, 2024 | Duration: 03:47:25 / 00:02:17 | Photo/Video Credit: Committee on Oversight and Accountability

Video: Landlord Found Dismembered In Freezer.

CHICAGO, IL - A woman on who lives on the Chicago’s North Side noticed that her landlord was missing ended up calling the police, which led to the body of Frances Walker.

"When the police arrived, that individual told the police there was another suspect who lived in the residence who the other tenants were afraid of.  And that suspect had recently called a tow truck and carried a heavy bag out to the tow truck," said Brendan Deenihan, CPD Chief of Detectives...

• Attribution: Peer Reviewed Politics™ | Media Attribution:  | Author(s): Dane Placko - News Report -  FOX 32 Chicago | Date: October 12, 2022 | Duration: 00:01:48 / 00:02:17 | Photo/Video Credit: FOX 32 Chicago

Video: Wisconsin Voter: Mandela Barnes Is Now Changing His Tune, Saying He Is for Police

Transcript:

Lawrence Jones: “Why are we just now finding out that Mandela Barnes the Lieutenant Governor’s for defund the police and now seems like he’s changing his tune, now that is a dead heat?” Unknown Female: “Yeah, he’s really changing his tone.  He — he used to say that letting prisoners out was sexy.  And now he’s trying to come across as a regular guy who’s for the police and that’s just not true.  And crime is a huge issue here.”

• Attribution: Peer Reviewed Politics™ | Media Attribution:  | Author(s): Lawrence Jones, unknown female - Wisconsin, Mandela Barnes - Fox and Friends | Date: October 12, 2022 | Duration: 00:00:25 | Photo/Video Credit: Fox News Channel (FNC)

Video: Tiffany Smiley Is Asking If Patty Murray Is Afraid of Debating a Farm Girl?

TRANSCRIPT:

Steve Hilton: I love it.  You put that so well.  But what I really noticed is the emotion when you have these attacks I didn’t realize she was saying that about you, but it is so disgusting and insulting.  How dare they do that?

Washington State - Tiffany Smiley: You are so right, because if democracy really mattered to Patty Murray she would have no problem debating me prior to the ballots being dropped.  For the people of Washington State they deserve to know what’s on the ballot prior to voting and this was wrong with her country across the board these are not Democrat or Republican issues, Steve.  These are American issues, this is about giving us the quality of life that immigrants are coming here to get this is what my husband sacrificed for what our family sacrificed in the American dream for all of us, that is why we are standing up and fighting even in the press say I am a hand-picked candidate, someone picked me to get into the race.  Our family got into this race, because it was the right thing to do.  If the average American cannot stand up and be a voice then who are we anymore?  We are standing up for the American dream for our children, for your children, for all of Washington for generations to come.  I was 11 years old when Patty Murray was first elected.  I don’t know is she's afraid to debate a farm girl from Pasco Washington or is she afraid of her 30 year record as the entrenched Washington D.C. bureaucrat?  That is the question at hand.

Steve: That’s one of the most important points..

• Attribution: Peer Reviewed Politics™ | Media Attribution: Air.TV | Author(s): Steve Hilton, Tiffany Smiley - Interview - The Next Revolution With Steve Hilton | Date: September 18, 2022 | Duration: 00:02:03 | Photo/Video Credit: Fox News Channel (FNC)

Article: Lockdown lifted at Lancaster High School...

Peer Reviewed Politics™: (Los Angles) Breaking: Lancaster High School on lockdown lifted following a false call about a shooter.  According to the sheriff's department, deputies responded to reports of a person with a gun on the campus.

Law enforcement say there is no evidence of a shooting. 

• Attribution: Peer Reviewed Politics™ | Media Attribution: Peer Reviewed Politics™ - Reporting / Sky Fox 11 - Video | Author(s): Peer Reviewed Politics™ - News Report  | Date: September 14, 2022 | Duration: 00:00:00 | Photo/Video Credit: Snapshot images from SkyFOX 11

Video: Orlando Man (a/k/a “Satans Child”) Arrested For Producing Child Rape Video

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Orlando, Florida – United States Attorney Roger B. Handberg announces the arrest of Miguel Diaz Gonzalez (40, Orlando) on a criminal complaint charging him with production of child sex abuse material.  If convicted, Gonzalez faces a minimum mandatory penalty of 15 years, and up to 30 years, in federal prison.  Gonzalez made his initial appearance before U.S. Magistrate Judge Celeste F. Bremer last week and has been ordered detained pending trial.

According to the complaint, the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC) received a tip concerning an online media storage account associated with username “Satans child,” and investigators found child sexual abuse material in that account.  Usage of the “Satans child” account was traced to Gonzalez’s home in Orlando.  Following the execution of a search warrant at Gonzalez’s home, law enforcement agents confirmed that Gonzalez uses the “Satans child” account and, thereafter, executed a warrant to search the account, which contained a video depicting Gonzalez raping an eight-year-old child who had previously been in Gonzalez’s care.

A complaint is merely a formal charge that a defendant has committed one or more violations of federal criminal law, and every defendant is presumed innocent unless, and until, proven guilty.

This case was investigated by Federal Bureau of Investigation, with assistance from the Orlando Police Department, the Seminole County Sheriff’s Office, and the Florida Department of Law Enforcement.  It will be prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Emily C. L. Chang.

This is another case brought as part of Project Safe Childhood, a nationwide initiative launched in May 2006 by the Department of Justice to combat the growing epidemic of child sexual exploitation and abuse.  Led by the United States Attorneys’ Office and the Criminal Division’s Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section, Project Safe Childhood marshals federal, state, and local resources to locate, apprehend, and prosecute individuals who sexually exploit children, and to identify and rescue victims.  For more information about Project Safe Childhood, please visit justice.gov/psc

• Attribution: Peer Reviewed Politics™ | Media Attribution: Department of Justice | Author(s): U.S. Attorney’s Office Middle District of Florida - FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE - Department of Justice | Date: September 13, 2022 | Duration: 00:00:00 | Photo/Video Credit: Department of Justice

Tweet: Law Enforcement Sources Tell Public Man Beheaded a Young Woman in the Middle of the Street in Front of Witnesses.

Transcript:

San Carlos, CA: The San Mateo County Sheriff's Office has arrested an adult male for murder in the City of San Carloos for an incident that occurred just before noon on Thursday, September 8, 2022.

According to the Sheriff's office tweet at approximately 11:50am on September 08, 2022, Deputies were flagged down in the area of Magnolia and Laurel in the City of San Carlos by witnesses reporting an assault in progress.

According to the tweet, Deputies arrived within minutes and located an adult female, deceased.  Shortly thereafter, the suspect returned to the scene and was detained by deputies.  He has since been placed under arrest for murder.  The suspect was known to the victim and this is believed to be an isolated incident.

There is no outstanding threat to the community.  Police are not releasing the identity of the victim pending notifications of family.  Investigation is ongoing.

Police are asking anyone with information related to the incident is encouraged to contact Detective Brandt with the Sheriff's Office at (650) 333-8195, dbrandt@smcgov.org.

• Attribution: Peer Reviewed Politics™ | Media Attribution: San Mateo County Sheriff's Office | Author(s): San Mateo County Sheriff's Office - Press Release | Date: September 09, 2022 |  Duration: 00:00:00 | Photo/Video Credit: San Mateo County Sheriff's Office

Video: Elected Las Vegas Official Arrested in Connection with Murder.

Las Vegas, NV.: An Elected Las Vegas Official was arrested in connection to murder of Las Vegas investigative reporter Jeff German, who was found stabbed to death just outside his home.

• Attribution: Peer Reviewed Politics™ | Media Attribution: Peer Reviewed Politics™ - Article / Las Vegas Police Article | Author(s): Alan Hoffer - Report - Peer Reviewed Politics™ | Date: September 08, 2022 |  Duration: 00:01:58 | Photo/Video Credit: Snapshot from KLAS-TV - Las Vegas and Video