Welcome to Peer Reviewed Politics^™

DOJ and FTC Warn Companies Against Illegal Gas Price Manipulation

Right click on the image to view

Supreme Court Ruling: Trump v. CASA, Inc., Ends in 6-3 Decision for President Trump

Right click on the image to enlarge

Washington D.C. In a 6-3 decision by United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) ended with a scathing rebuke of the lower courts meddling with Presidential Executive Orders.

The President of the United States issued an Executive Order 14160, titled "Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship," which was signed by President Donald J. Trump on January 20, 2025, which was his first day in office.  This Executive Order aimed to end birthright citizenship for children born in the U.S. to mothers unlawfully present or lawfully present on temporary visas when the father is neither a U.S. citizen nor a lawful permanent resident.

President Trump's Executive Order was blocked by multiple 'limited jurisdiction district courts' with leftist activist federal judges and the Executive Order has faced at least ten different lawsuits from states and civil rights groups, which really are not civil rights groups, but more like a bunch of activist NGO's who work on the behalf of the Democrat party, which the end up grifting off the U.S. tax payers for helping foreign born person manipulate immigration laws in order gain access to the United States without really having any viable asylum claim to be in the United States in the first place.

These ten underlying lawsuits challenged Trump's Executive Order 14160, which is a directive redefining when a U.S. born child is “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States.  The Supreme Court did not rule on the constitutionality of the lawful order, instead:

The Court’s answer: Almost certainly not.

The Majority’s Holding (Justice Barrett, 6–3)

The Court ruled that universal injunctions by limited jurisdiction courts exceeds the equitable authority granted to federal district courts under the Judiciary Act of 1789.  In plain terms: federal judges of a limited jurisdiction court cannot freeze a federal policy for everyone, but only for the people who actually sued.  A similar ruling in the past by the SCOTUS also addressed the authority and jurisdiction of limited jurisdiction courts when it comes to Executive Orders.  It appears the lower courts did not seem to get the earlier message or that they don't really care what the SCOTUS rules or thinks.

The federal law is quite clear, its framed in Constitution under Executive Authority.  Under Article II of the United States Constitution, the President inherants enumerated powers from the Constitution, which gives the president the responsibilities and duty to see that the laws are faithfully executed, it outlines the powers of the president, and provides in times of emergency the president can override Congress and issue executive orders with almost limitless power.

The founders understood that our country would need an energetic executive to lead the country, in Federalist 70, Hamilton argued that a strong, energetic executive leader would be essential for any effective republican government, both for security and for stable administration and without this a feeble executive would lead to feeble execution, which would results in bad government, regardless of how good the system appears to be in theory.

Right click on the image to enlarge

Why Executive Energy Matters

• Protection from foreign threats — A vigorous executive is necessary to defend the nation.
• Reliable enforcement of laws — Weak execution leads to poor governance.
• Safeguarding property and justice — Prevents disorderly groups from disrupting legal processes.
• Defense of liberty — Shields the republic from ambition, factionalism, and anarchy.

The Key Legal Findings in this Ruling

1. The Judiciary Act authorizes only those equitable remedies “traditionally accorded by courts of equity” at the founding.
2. Historical English and American equity courts never issued injunctions protecting nonparties.
3. Universal injunctions have no founding‑era analogue, and therefore fall outside federal courts’ statutory authority.
4. The Court partially stayed the lower courts’ injunctions only to the extent they protected nonparties.

Why this All Matters

The ruling sharply limits a tool that has become common in modern political litigation—where a limited jurisdiction district court judge could halt a presidential policy nationwide within hours.

Concurring Opinions

Justice Thomas (joined by Gorsuch) reiterated his long‑standing criticism of universal injunctions, arguing they distort Article III and invite judicial overreach.

Justice Alito (joined by Thomas) emphasized that universal injunctions improperly transform district judges into “super‑legislators” capable of blocking federal policy nationwide.

Justice Kavanaugh agreed with the majority, but highlighted the need for clearer standards governing injunction scope.

Dissenting Opinions

Justice Sotomayor (joined by Kagan & Jackson) argued that the majority’s historical test is overly rigid and ignores modern realities where federal policies affect millions simultaneously.  Sotomayor warned that limiting injunctions to named plaintiffs will:

• Fragment relief across multiple lawsuits
• Encourage duplicative litigation
• Reduce courts’ ability to prevent widespread constitutional harm

Justice Jackson, in separate dissent, stressed that universal injunctions can be necessary when federal policies impose systemic harms that cannot be remedied through plaintiff‑specific relief.

The Supreme Court Just Rewired the Balance of Power

The Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. CASA, Inc. will be remembered less for its immediate effect on Executive Order 14160 and more for its long‑term restructuring of federal judicial power.  By declaring that limited jurisdiction federal courts lack authority to issue universal injunctions, the Court has effectively ended a 10‑year abuse of judicial power, whereas a single limited jurisdiction district judge could freeze a presidential policy nationwide before breakfast.  It enables the founders interpretation of three branches of government and allows government to operate with a quickness during a national emergency rather hamstringing the government using a bureaucracy to slow down using an executive power of a president.

This ruling is not about immigration.  It’s not about birthright citizenship.  It’s about who gets to decide the scope of federal power in real time — and the Court just handed that back equal footing to Executive Branch, so there is only 'three branches of government' and no bureaucracies that water down the the second branch of governments power.

As we here at Peer Reviewed Politics™ pointed out early in this editorial, the Federalist Papers #70 proves our founders intended to only have three equal branches of government, not two, four or five branches of government.  Having a branch of government that need to litigate through a bunch of bureaucracies (inferior courts) before it can move forward with its duties under the Constitution, impairs that branch of government from getting things done and it costs the taxpayer tons of money and puts our national security at risk over partisan politics.

The End of an Era of “Judge Shopping” Stops

For years, universal injunctions and judge shopping were the emergency brake of American politics.  When a president issued a sweeping policy, advocacy groups raced to friendly jurisdictions, hoping to find a judge willing to halt the entire program nationwide.

The Highest Court in the land has now said: No more!

The majority’s reasoning is straightforward; federal courts can only issue the kinds of equitable remedies that existed in 1789.  Those remedies protected parties, not the entire country.  Universal injunctions, the Court argues, are a modern invention with no historical pedigree.

Whether one agrees or disagrees, the implications are enormous.

Peer Reviewed Politics Weekly Podcast - Trump v CASA

The following audio recording was made by Peer Reviewed Politics^™. 🇺🇸🦅

• Audio Made On: 06-29-2026

Download this Podcast

DNI's Tulsi Gabbard Reveals Evidence of U.S. Taxpayer-Funded Global Biolab Program

Image created by Peer Reviewed Politics^™
Right or left click on the image to
view the unclassified document.

This editorial reflects the perspective and claims presented in the source material provided by ODNI Director Tulsi Gabbard.  We have no reason whatsoever in our investigation to doubt any of this source material after reviewing and researching this material.

WASHINGTON D.C.:  After months of reviewing intelligence holdings and government files, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has announced evidence of U.S. government funding for more than 120 biological laboratories in over 30 countries. Among the facilities cited are laboratories in Ukraine, which intelligence officials previously warned could be vulnerable to attack, seizure, or damage during the ongoing Russia–Ukraine conflict. According to those assessments, at least one U.S.-funded laboratory likely contained dangerous pathogens and faced heightened security risks.

Gabbard argues that information about the existence, funding, and operation of these laboratories was withheld from the American public.  The director contends that critics who raised questions about the labs were often dismissed or accused of spreading disinformation.  Whether one accepts that characterization or not, the broader issue remains difficult to ignore: taxpayers deserve a clear accounting of where U.S. funds are going, what kinds of research are being supported, and what safeguards are being put in place when hazardous pathogens are involved.

Today, I’m releasing never before seen intelligence revealing new evidence of past US government funding for more than 120 biolabs in over 30 countries, including Ukraine.

In support of President Trump‘s Executive Order to end federal funding of dangerous gain of function… pic.twitter.com/RkPHnAbka9

— DNI Tulsi Gabbard (@DNIGabbard) June 12, 2026

The controversy becomes more serious when it turns to gain-of-function research, a category of work that involves altering pathogens in ways that can increase transmissibility, virulence, or host range.  Supporters argue such research can improve preparedness against future pandemics.  Critics warn that the same experiments can create risks that far outweigh their scientific benefits, particularly if oversight fails or accidents occur.  The source material claims that some U.S.-funded laboratories have engaged in research involving hazardous and highly contagious pathogens, including work that may qualify as gain-of-function like the Covid 19 research in Wuhan, China, whereas the labs operating with limited visibility and oversight.

The source material also points to President Trump's Executive Order 14292, signed on May 25, 2025, which it says was intended to end federal funding of gain-of-function research worldwide.  Supporters of the order view it as a necessary response to lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic and to concerns about laboratory safety.  Opponents counter that a blanket prohibition could hinder legitimate scientific work aimed at understanding emerging diseases and developing countermeasures.

What should not be controversial is the need for transparency, rigorous oversight, and accountability.  If the United States is funding biological research abroad—especially research involving dangerous pathogens; Congress, inspectors general, independent scientists, and the public should have access to sufficient information to evaluate the risks and benefits.  Secrecy may sometimes be necessary for national security, but secrecy cannot become a substitute for oversight.

The source material says Gabbard has directed the Intelligence Community to increase collection efforts related to these overseas laboratories. According to the announcement, that effort is already producing additional information about clinical trials and other activities underway at some facilities, raising questions about ethics, finances, and security. Those claims will require careful scrutiny and, ideally, independent verification.

Ultimately, the debate over overseas biolabs and gain-of-function research is not merely about partisan politics.  It is about how a republic society balances scientific advancement, national security, public health, and the public's right to know.  If government-funded research has the potential to affect global health and safety, then the standards for disclosure and oversight should be exceptionally high.

May 2026 Employment Situation

Image created by Peer Reviewed Politics^™
Right click on the image to view

United States:  The May 2026 employment situation for Nonfarm payrolls increased by 172,000 in May, extending a steady but moderating hiring trend.  The unemployment rate held at 4.3%, where it has remained since mid‑2025.  Revisions to March and April added a combined 93,000 jobs, strengthening the underlying trajectory.

Labor Market Conditions

The household survey showed minimal movement across core indicators:

• Unemployment rate: 4.3% (unchanged)
• Unemployed persons: 7.3 million (little changed)
• Labor force participation: 61.8% (flat)
• Employment‑population ratio: 59.2% (flat)

Short‑term unemployment (less than 5 weeks) fell sharply by 286,000, reversing April’s increase. Long‑term unemployment remained elevated at 2.0 million, up 524,000 over the year and now 27.5% of all unemployed workers.

The number of people working part time for economic reasons held at 4.8 million, while 6.2 million people outside the labor force still reported wanting a job.

Industry Job Growth

Payroll gains were concentrated in three sectors, with leisure and hospitality leading:

• Leisure & hospitality: +70,000
• Food services & drinking places: +48,000Z

This is well above the 12‑month average of +14,000.

• Local government: +55,000
• Excluding education: +44,000
• Health care: +35,000
• Ambulatory services: +26,000
• Home health care: +11,000
• Hospitals: +6,000
• Social assistance: +12,000
• Mining, quarrying, oil & gas: +5,000 (up 10,000 since February)

These sectors collectively account for the majority of May’s net job creation.

Industries Showing Weakness

The most significant contraction occurred in financial activities, continuing a year‑long decline:

• Financial activities: –22,000
• Down 107,000 since May 2025
• Insurance carriers: –11,000
• Commercial banking: –3,000

Transportation and warehousing was flat (+1,000) but remains 92,000 below its February 2025 peak. Air transportation lost 9,000 jobs due to a business closure.

Most other major industries—including construction, manufacturing, wholesale and retail trade, information, and professional services—showed little change.

Wages and Hours

Wage growth remained steady:

• Average hourly earnings: $37.53
• +$0.12 in May (+0.3%)
• +3.4% over the year
• Production & nonsupervisory: $32.31 (+$0.08)

Hours were stable:

• Average workweek: 34.3 hours
• Manufacturing: 40.4 hours
• Overtime: 3.1 hours
• Production & nonsupervisory: 33.8 hours

Revision Impact

Upward revisions to March (+29,000) and April (+64,000) add 93,000 jobs to the two‑month total, indicating stronger momentum than initially reported.

California Elections are Starting to be Questioned

Image from commons.wikimedia.org
Click on the image to view

LOS ANGELES:  On Friday, a federal prosecutor announced that his office is pursuing multiple election‑fraud investigations in coordination with the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

On X/Twitter, First Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Central District of California Bill Essayli stated: “My office has multiple election fraud investigations underway in coordination with the FBI’s Los Angeles Field Office.  We will follow the evidence wherever it leads and prosecute any violations of federal election law to the fullest extent.”

Protecting the integrity of California’s elections is a top priority for my office.

California’s election system has serious structural vulnerabilities. Universal vote-by-mail with no voter ID requirements creates conditions where fraud can go undetected and unpunished, eroding…

— F.A. United States Attorney Bill Essayli (@USAttyEssayli)June 5, 2026

According to the California Secretary of State’s website, California has the largest number of registered voters in the nation — more than 23 million.  State law grants county election officials 30 days to complete the canvass period.  During this time, officials process and count provisional ballots, same day registration ballots, and vote‑by‑mail ballots postmarked by Election Day and received within seven days.

Secretary of State Shirley Weber reiterated Thursday that the 30‑day timeline is required to ensure accuracy.  “Ensuring that all valid votes cast by eligible voters are accurately processed and counted takes time,” Weber said. “Our commitment is immediate: in California, every ballot is counted properly and every ballot is accounted for.”

In a Facebook advertisement from the Secretary of State’s office echoed the message: “Accuracy comes before speed.”

The Santa Barbara Independent also noted that California is the nation’s largest voting state, with millions of ballots to process.  The publication emphasized that taking the necessary time protects voters’ rights and ensures election integrity, stating that California has built a system designed to expand access and empower voters.

Concerns Over Delays and Ballot Patterns

While we agree accuracy is important, critics argue that taking until July to finish counting an election held in early June is unreasonable — especially as ‘copious’ numbers of ballots continue arrive for just one candidate, which appearing to favor a single candidate or party.  To some observers, “something smells rotten in Los Angeles,” and its not coming from skid road either.  It should be noted that the U.S. Attorney’s Office appears to share the same concerns.

Teamwork/dreamwork.

Ask yourselves — why does California (& many other states) hide their voter rolls from the federal government at the same time they gladly hand them over to liberal activist groups?!

🧐hmmm https://t.co/PXznPFqTZr

— AAGHarmeetDhillon (@AAGDhillon) June 5, 2026

First Assistant U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli said his office is also working with Harmeet Dhillon, Assistant Attorney General for the DOJ Civil Rights Division, “to conduct a comprehensive audit of California’s voter rolls.”  He reiterated that there are “multiple election fraud investigations underway,” adding: “We will follow the evidence wherever it leads and prosecute any violations of federal election law to the fullest extent.”

Parallels Drawn to 2020 and Shifting Vote Totals

Many voters recall what happened during the 2020 election, when President Trump held a commanding lead on election night, only for the numbers to shift dramatically as counting continued.

Los Angeles County reports 4.3 million registered voters, and some residents say they are seeing similar patterns now.  For example, critics note that Spencer Pratt’s early lead over Nithya Raman has steadily eroded as more ballots arrive — with Pratt’s totals slowing while both Democratic candidates totals rise.

Right click on the image to view

In the governor’s race, the same trend appears to be affecting Steve Hilton, who initially led by roughly 5%.  As additional ballots are counted, that lead has narrowed significantly, prompting concerns that 'the fix is in.'

Right click on the image to view

Why can states like Florida know by the end of night who won, while it takes a month to count votes in California?  As of April 2026, California had about 23.1 million registered voters and Florida has 13.4 million registered voters.

We here at Peer Reviewed Politics^™ think that these ballots should have a forensic evaluation.  Large amounts of votes for one candidate coming in all at once is very unusual as time drags on.

Is It Time for Senate Leader John Thune to Go?

Click on the image to view

Peer Reviewed Politics^™ Editorial Analysis: WASHINGTON, D.C. — The question reverberating through conservative circles this week is no longer whispered.  It is being asked openly, forcefully, and with growing urgency: Is it time to replace Senate Majority Leader John Thune?

The spark came on March 27, 2026, when Rep. John Rose (R‑TN) publicly called for Thune’s removal after the Senate rushed through a funding bill that ended the 43‑day partial government shutdown, but it excluded funding for ICE and CBP through September 30, 2026.

.

“We should call on Thune to step aside,” Rose told Newsmax host Todd Starnes, accusing Senate leadership of capitulating to Democrats and abandoning core Republican priorities.

Don’t let anyone fool you into thinking the Senate’s dirty DHS deal was just @LeaderJohnThune — rank-and-file Republican senators were in on it too.

Any single Republican senator could have stopped the Thune/Schumer DHS deal, but not one did. Not a single one.

Republican…

— Congressman John Rose (@RepJohnRose) March 29, 2026

Representative Rose doubled down days later on X, blasting what he called the “Thune/Schumer DHS deal” and noting that any single Republican senator could have stopped it — but none did.

A Shutdown That Hit Hard

The shutdown’s impact was severe.  According to White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt, roughly 50,000 DHS employees went unpaid, and nearly 500 TSA officers quit, triggering nationwide airport delays and security bottlenecks.

Yet before leaving for a two‑week recess, the Senate unanimously approved a bipartisan bill funding most of DHS — except ICE and CBP.  The compromise, engineered by Thune in coordination with Senate Democrats, left immigration enforcement agencies without new appropriations.

Critics argue Thune could have passed a Republican‑only bill by eliminating the filibuster, a move Democrats have repeatedly signaled they would pursue if they regain unified control of Congress.  Democrats have openly campaigned on weakening or abolishing the 60‑vote threshold to pass major legislation, including abortion codification and federal voting reforms.

Former Sen. Kyrsten Sinema even circulated a list of Democrats who have supported eliminating the filibuster, underscoring how mainstream the idea has become within the party.

Turns out, someone HAS made the spreadsheet. Bless this platform. https://t.co/hfIMJDIubs pic.twitter.com/VI2mEN2mU1

— Kyrsten Sinema (@kyrstensinema) March 15, 2025

Even Rep. Alexandria Ocasio‑Cortez (D‑NY) was extremely blunt: “The same Dems who argue to keep the filibuster ‘for when we need it’ do not, in fact, use it when we need it.”

House Republicans Reject the Senate Deal

When the Senate sent the House GOP leaders their bill, House Republicans swiftly rejected the Senate bill.  Speaker Mike Johnson called it a “joke,” insisting Republicans would not support any measure that withheld ICE funding.  Johnson defended Thune personally, arguing Senate Democrats “forced this upon” Republicans — a claim many conservatives dispute.

Pressure Mounts on Thune From the Right

The controversy deepened when President Donald Trump urged Thune to fire Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough after she ruled that four sections of the GOP’s $72 billion immigration package violated the Byrd Rule.  Thune declined to act, even as Sen. Tommy Tuberville joined calls for her removal.

MacDonough, who was appointed in 2012 by Democratic Majority Leader Harry Reid, has repeatedly blocked Republican immigration priorities, fueling conservative frustration.

For many in the America First movement, this episode was the latest in a long pattern: Thune obstructing or diluting the Trump agenda, even after supporting the 2017 tax reform bill.

Peer Reviewed Politics^™ warned years ago that elevating Senator Thune after Mitch McConnell’s departure would empower a leader misaligned with the party’s populist base.  Recent events have only reinforced our assessment.

Voters Are Responding and RINOs Are Falling

The electorate appears to be taking notice.  In the May 5, 2026 primaries, several Republicans who opposed the new congressional map and who have clashed with the America First wing — were defeated:

• Dan Dernulc — lost
• Linda Rogers — lost
• Travis Holdman — lost
• James Buck — lost
• Spencer Deery — barely surviving by 3 votes
• Greg Walker — lost
• Greg Goode — the only one to survive

Other high‑profile losses since March include:

• Dan Crenshaw (TX)
• Bill Cassidy (LA)
• John Cornyn (TX)
• Thomas Massie (KY)

The message from GOP voters is unmistakable: the party is shifting, and those who resist the America First agenda are being replaced.

The Test Ahead: Will Thune Bring the SAVE Act to the Floor?

Which brings us back to the central question: Will John Thune wake up to the political reality around him — or will he be replaced? The clearest test will be whether he brings the SAVE Act to the Senate floor.

For many conservatives, the SAVE Act is essential to safeguarding elections from fraud and foreign interference.  Failure to advance it would confirm what critics have long argued: Thune is out of step with the party’s base and unwilling to fight for core priorities.

At Peer Reviewed Politics^™, our position is clear: The SAVE Act must pass and if Thune won’t fight for it, the GOP must find a leader who will.

Hear our new song called Halls of Thune©

Halls of Thune©

The following audio recording was made by Peer Reviewed Politics^™. 🇺🇸🦅

• Audio Made On: 05-31-2026

Download this song

The DOJ Opens Probe Into Washington’s Women’s Prison

Click on the Image to view the Indictment

Washington, DC: Federal civil‑rights officials have launched a sweeping investigation into the Washington Corrections Center for Women (WCCW), following allegations that the state has failed to protect female inmates from sexual and physical harm after housing male prisoners—individuals who identify as female, inside the Gig Harbor facility.

In a formal DOJ notice sent to Governor Bob Ferguson on May 19, Assistant Attorney General Harmeet K. Dhillon said the Justice Department is examining whether Washington’s Department of Corrections has allowed a 'pattern or practice' of constitutional violations at the state’s only women’s prison.  The probe is being conducted under the Civil Rights of Institutionalized Persons Act (CRIPA), which authorizes federal intervention when inmates’ rights may be systematically denied.

Allegations of Violence and Systemic Failures

According to the DOJ’s letter, investigators are acting on information suggesting that WCCW “failed to protect female prisoners from sexual and physical violence, harassment, voyeurism, and intimidation” by male inmates transferred into the facility.  The Department says it will scrutinize policies, incident reports, and internal practices to determine whether the state knowingly exposed women to preventable harm.

Notably, the letter does not specify how many incidents have been reported, how long the alleged failures persisted, or whether state officials previously raised concerns internally.  Those gaps now form the core of what federal investigators intend to uncover.

Washington’s Liability and What Investigators Want to Know

The DOJ emphasized that it has not reached any conclusions.  But in the scope of the inquiry signals that investigators are looking beyond isolated misconduct and toward potential systemic failures:

• Were risk assessments conducted before placing male inmates in women’s housing?
• Did staff report concerns that were ignored or minimized?
• Were allegations of sexual assault or intimidation properly documented and investigated?
• Did state officials knowingly maintain policies that increased the likelihood of harm?

These are the types of questions CRIPA investigations typically pursue, and the answers could determine whether Washington faces a negotiated settlement or a federal civil‑rights lawsuit.

Federal Pressure and a Warning

While the DOJ stresses cooperation, the letter carries an implicit warning: if investigators confirm constitutional violations, Washington will be expected to negotiate reforms.  Historically, CRIPA cases have resulted in binding agreements that overhaul staffing, housing classifications, surveillance systems, and inmate‑safety protocols.

What Happens Next

Attorneys from the Civil Rights Division and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Western District of Washington will lead the inquiry and are expected to request extensive documentation from the state.  The DOJ says it will “seek to minimize disruption,” but CRIPA investigations often involve on‑site inspections, interviews with inmates and staff, and deep reviews of internal communications.

This notice has been just released today, so the State of Washington has likely not yet had a chance to publicly responded to the notice, but its not like Sideshow Bob was not warned about this after being elected, so its likely he's in hot water again.

How the Public Can Help

The Justice Department is also soliciting information from current or former inmates, staff, or others with knowledge of conditions at WCCW or similar facilities.  Tips can be submitted at civil rights.justice.gov/report.  The Department is separately gathering information nationwide on the housing of male inmates in women’s correctional facilities and can be reached at (202) 616‑5939 or
SingleSexPrison.Initiative@usdoj.gov.

Southern Poverty Law Center Funneled more than $3 million in Donated Funds to Individuals Associated with Violent Extremist Groups.

Click on the Image to view the Indictment

Montgomery, Alabama: According to an allege indictment made by a Grand Jury on Tuesday, April 21, 2026, in Montgomery, Alabama, a non-profit, called the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), had secretly funneled more than $3 million in donated funds to individuals who were associated with various violent extremist groups including the Ku Klux Klan, Aryan Nations, and National Socialist Party of America.

The Grand Jury returned an indictment charging the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) with 11 counts of wire fraud, false statements to a federally insured bank, and conspiracy to commit concealment money laundering.

The U.S. Attorney's Office for the Middle District of Alabama, Northern Division, has filed two civil forfeiture actions seeking to recover proceeds allegedly obtained through the organization's fraud scheme.  The case was investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), with support from the Internal Revenue Service – Criminal Investigation unit, (IRS-CI).

“The SPLC is manufacturing racism to justify its existence,” said Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche.  “Using donor money to allegedly profit off Klansmen cannot go unchecked.  This Department of Justice will hold the SPLC and every other fraudulent organization operating with the same deceptive play book accountable.  Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche said, “No entity is above the law.”

FBI Director Kash Patel stated “The SPLC allegedly engaged in a massive fraud operation to deceive their donors, enrich themselves, and hide their deceptive operations from the public."  FBI Director Kash Patel continued to state, "They lied to their donors, vowing to dismantle violent extremist groups, and actually turned around and paid the leaders of these very extremist groups - even utilizing the funds to have these groups facilitate the commission of state and federal crimes.  That is illegal – and this is an ongoing investigation against all individuals involved.”

The Southern Poverty Law Center — a Montgomery, Alabama-based nonprofit that has long positioned itself as being a leading force in the fight against racial injustice — but it now finds itself at the center of a federal investigation.  According to the FBI, the organization publicly describes its mission during the period in question as serving as "a catalyst for racial justice in the South and beyond," committed to dismantling white supremacy and advancing human rights.  Federal investigators, however, allege a far different picture behind that stated mission.  There are now serious questions on how long this has be allegedly has been going on with this so called non-profit.

Federal prosecutors allege that beginning in the 1980s, the SPLC built and operated a covert network of individuals embedded within violent extremist organizations — including the Ku Klux Klan — some of whom had infiltrated these groups at the direct instruction of SPLC leadership.  The indictment paints a striking contradiction: while the organization publicly condemned white supremacist groups on its website and fundraised on the strength of that message, prosecutors say donor funds were being quietly funneled to the very leaders and organizers of those same racist organizations — without donors' knowledge or consent.

“Donors gave their money believing they were supporting the fight against violent extremism,” said Acting United States Attorney Kevin Davidson.  The Acting United States Attorney Kevin Davidson continues, “As alleged, the SPLC instead diverted a portion of those funds to benefit individuals and groups they claimed to oppose.  That kind of deception undermines public trust and social cohesion.”

Between 2014 and 2023, the SPLC secretly funneled more than $3 million in donated funds to individuals who were associated with various violent extremist groups including:

• Ku Klux Klan
• United Klans of America
• Unite the Right (A democrat organization pretending to be a right-wing organization)
• National Alliance
• National Socialist Movement
• National Socialist Party of America (American Nazi Party) Aryan Nations affiliated Sadistic Souls Motorcycle Club
• American Front

The organizations named in connection with the case share a common ideological alignment — all are rooted in left-wing political movements with long-standing ties to the Democratic Party.  Critics have pointed out that some of these institutional relationships trace back generations, with roots extending to political alliances formed well before the civil rights era.

At the heart of the indictment lies a straightforward allegation: the SPLC systematically deceived its donors.  Federal prosecutors contend that the organization solicited contributions under materially false pretences, telling their donors like George Clooney and other Hollywood elites that their money would fund civil rights work, while diverting funds to purposes never disclosed.

To conceal the payments, prosecutors allege the SPLC established a web of bank accounts tied to fictitious entities — shell organizations designed to obscure the true nature, origin, and destination of donated funds.  According to the indictment, this layered financial structure allowed the organization to quietly route donor money to individuals operating within or alongside extremist groups, all while maintaining the public appearance of a legitimate nonprofit.  To sustain the scheme over time, the SPLC allegedly made a series of false statements regarding the operation and purpose of those accounts.

A conviction will result in the forfeiture of financial gains from the alleged illegal activities.

The Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche and FBI Director Kash Patel made the announcement of this indictment in Washington D.C.

Governor Kathy Hochul Demeaningly Begs Wealthy Ex-New Yorkers to Return to New York

New York: In a very demeaning fashion Governor Kathy Hochul did an interview with Politico begging wealthy Ex-New Yorkers to come back to support funding the state’s public handouts after previously telling these wealthy New Yorkers in 2022, like President Trump, to jump on a bus and head down to Florida to where you belong and to get out of town, because they don't represent Hochul's values.

New York Gov. Kathy Hochul tells Republicans to "jump on a bus and head down to Florida where you belong...you are not New Yorkers" pic.twitter.com/FazoHqPAZu

— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) August 28, 2022

It appears the shoe seems to be on the other foot now, because Hochul is now saying, “Maybe the first step should be to go down to Palm Beach and see who we can bring back home, because our tax base has been eroded.”  We here at Peer Reviewed Politics^™ thought that wealthy people, like President Trump, don't represent your so-called values?  Hochul claimed that in 2022.

Hochul continued to state, “I have to look at the fact that we are in competition with other states who have less of a tax burden on their corporations and their individuals.”  Hmm, we wonder why?  States like Florida have way more roads, infrastructure and people, but yet seem to have less of tax burden on corporations and individuals.  It sounds like New York has spending problem and its priorities are not are not well thought out, you think?

We guess that the wealthy only represent the values of New York, California, Washington and other blue states when the wealthy have their wallets wide open and allow these communist to take what they want.  Other than that, it appears states New York doesn't have no use for them at all.  That really says a lot about who Democrats really are.  People need to understand and realize that wealthy individuals and companies pay a majority of taxes in our country, they make investments in their communities, and they also employ people.

Obviously, a lot of Democrats Governors and politicians, like Kathy Hochul, seem not to be able to understand basic pocketbook economics.  To top it off, Kathy Hochul also seems to have a problem with modesty and a serious issue of showing some humility when saying that "patriotic millionaires" should "cut me a check."

Washington Legislators Screw Themselves Passing Income Tax Bill

The Other Washington: In Washington State, the State House of Representatives took up the second reading on ESSB 6346 (Establishing a tax on millionaires) bill on March 6, 2026 and on March 9, 2026, the House added and adopted floor amendment(s) to the bill, after its second reading.  After amendments were added, the House rules were suspended, then there was third reading of the bill, floor debates then took place on the bill, which lasted more last more than 24 hour straight.

After one of the longest floor debates in Washington state history by the Republican party against this heinous bill, the bill still went forward for a vote. It ended up passing with 51 yeas; 46 nays; 0 absent; and 1 excused.  Here is the roll call of that vote.  The bill basically passed on a strictly party‑line split, with every Republican opposing the bill and eightDemocrats breaking ranks to join Republicans opposing this bad bill.

One of the most funniest things that could happen after the vote, Democrats had insisted in their floor debate that wealthy residents would not leave state, well that statement that Democrats had argued on the floor came back to bite them in the you know what.  It wasn't much more than 2 hours after the vote, Starbuck's Founder 'Howard Schultz' announced that he was moving his family to Miami.  You just can't make this crap up.  Of course you did not hear this information from main stream media, only insiders and small media outlets like ours are reporting on this, because its an embarrassment to Democrats.

Howard Schultz will be joining Jeff Bezo in Miami, sipping lattes on the South Beach, and laughing at Washingtonians being raked over the coals for the legislators' new income tax that a bunch of idiots in the legislature who thought they were going to get one over on the rich, but found out different.

Since amendments were added to the new 'Income Tax' bill, it had to go back to the Senate to be voted on.  On March 11, 2026 the Senate concurred with the House amendments.  Then in the Senate, they voted on the bill, where it passed final passage with 27 yeas; 21 nays; 0 absent, 1 was excused.  Here is the roll call of that vote.

On March 12, 2026, the President of the Senate signed the bill and it was forwarded to the House were the Speaker signed off on the bill.  On March 13, 2026, it was delivered to the Governor.

If Governor Bob Ferguson (aka Sideshow Bob) signs this bill, as he has already stated he will, it will establish a new illegal income tax in the State of Washington and it will mark the largest tax increase for two consecutive years in a row in Washington’s history.  This is a far cry from what Sideshow Bob had promised the residents of Washington when elected. If the bill is signed into law, Washington State will have the highest taxes in the United States.

In other news, according to CNBC, Jeff Bezos will save over $600 million in taxes with his move to Miami.  Yes, that's how its done folks.  It's very much looks like Jeff Bezos and other business will be moving their business next out of the state, which will cost Washingtonians, 10's of thousands of jobs in the long run.  We here at Peer Reviewed Politics^™ are asking, if it's' too soon to say, would the last person in Seattle, please turn out the lights?

Thanks Sideshow Bob!

Hear our new song called Turn Out the Lights©

Turn Out the Lights©

The following audio recording was made by Peer Reviewed Politics^™. 🇺🇸🦅

• Audio Made On: 05-31-2026

Download this song

President Trump Takes Action on Truth in Advertising, "Made In America"

Washington D.C.: On March 13, 2026, President Trump signed an Executive Order requiring products that advertise that a product is made in the America, must be made in the United States.

Preside Trump indicated that Americans deserve clear, accurate, well‑supported, and easily accessible information about whether products advertised as “Made in America” are truly manufactured in the United States, as this will protect consumers from deceptive American‑origin claims.  This will safeguard businesses that genuinely invest in American workers, materials, and manufacturing.

In today’s digital marketplace, foreign manufacturers and online sellers are increasingly marketing their goods as being U.S.‑made to appeal to patriotic consumers. Lots of consumers routinely rely on “Made in America” tag and similar origin claims when purchasing items through digital platforms.

President Trump's Executive Order indicates that American companies that build, grow, and manufacture all or nearly all aspects of their products domestically are entitled to the full branding value that comes from supporting the American economy.  Americans who intentionally choose to buy American‑made products should have confidence and clarity about what those claims actually mean.

You can read more about President Trump's' Executive Order here

According to BEA.gov the U.S. Trade Deficit Plunges in January as Exports Surge and Imports Cool

Snapshot of U.S. International Trade in Goods and Services Deficit

Washington D.C.: The U.S. trade deficit narrowed sharply in January of 2026, falling 25.3% from the previous month to $54.5 billion, according to new data released by the Bureau of Economic Analysis on March 12, 2026.  The deficit also improved compared with early 2025, signaling continued year‑over‑year strengthening in America’s trade position.

A major driver of the shift was a 5.5% jump in U.S. exports, a gain of $15.8 billion that pushed total outbound shipments above $302 billion.  Service exports also climbed, rising more than $1.2 billion to reach $106.7 billion at the start of 2026.

Snapshot of BEA.gov Goods and Services Trade Deficit Graph

Imports moved in the opposite direction, slipping $2.6 billion (0.7%) to just under $357 billion.  Consumer goods saw the steepest decline at $3.3 billion, followed by a $2.8 billion drop in automotive parts and engines.  Imports of industrial supplies and materials also fell by $1.4 billion.

The BEA report shows broad improvement in the U.S. trade balance with key partners.  The deficit with the European Union shrank by more than $5 billion in January, while the U.S. surplus with the United Kingdom grew to $7 billion, a month‑over‑month increase of $3.2 billion.  Meanwhile, the long‑standing trade imbalance with China showed little movement, holding at $12.5 billion.

You can read more about the international trade in goods and services deficit at:

Another Outstanding Month for Jobs in the United States Economy.

Snapshot of a Graph at the federalreserve.gov

Federal Reserve: President Donald J. Trump had another outstanding month for the economy.  According to multiple market news sources, the United States added another 147,000 jobs to the jobs market, which beat expectations for four straight months now.  Labor Department provided revisions to the April and May payrolls, which added 16,000 jobs to the jobs market.

While there were increases in the public sector, we have seen about 69,000 government jobs disappear since January 2025, making the government more lean and mean.  These jobs that were removed are in HHS and the IRS as the reduction in government workers are helping the government spend less and help getting rid of waste, fraud, and abuse.

Deportations have resulted in more citizens coming into the work force and employers were paying higher pay again, this month rising roughly 0.2% from May 2025.  Wages for working Americans continue to rise — with average hourly earnings up by close to 4% over the past year.

The health care field added roughly 39,000 jobs.  State governments added roughly 47,000 workers, while local governments added about 33,000 employees.

The Trump Administration is working hard to push foreign workers out of the labor force, as Native-born workers now account for all the job gains, since January 2025.  Foreign-born employment has fallen to a negative of -543,000 workers since January 2025, while native-born citizen employment has increased by 2,079,000.  This is a big win for American citizens.  Under the radical communist left Democrats, during the same period last year, foreign-born workers accounted for more than 48% of new jobs.  This distorted the employment numbers for American citizens, running a majority of them out of unemployment benefits, before being able to find another job.

States like the State of Washington and California were manipulating the employment numbers with illegal aliens in order to keep unemployed citizens off unemployment benefits, which kept labor markets appearing to look better than they actually were, despite more than a year of downward revisions of the employment numbers under the Biden Administration.  This basically denied the unemployment extensions to American citizens for unemployment benefits.

A report from the Fox Business Network’s Cheryl Casone state, “You do have a strong employment picture … we have NOT seen inflation rise.  In fact, inflation has been going down and going down and going down … prices are lower than they were for July 4th last year.”

.@cherylcasone: "You do have a strong employment picture... we have NOT seen inflation rise. In fact, inflation has been going down and going down and going down... prices are lower than they were for July 4th last year." pic.twitter.com/93lA4KsPnz

— Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) July 3, 2025

An economic report from Bloomberg’s Jonathan Ferro stated “This is good news; much better than expected.  An upside surprise on headline payrolls … jobless claims — MUCH LOWER than expected.  Across the board here in the labor market, this is a pretty solid read!”

BLOOMBERG: "This is good news; much better than expected."

"In our survey, economists were looking for [the unemployment rate] to climb up to 4.3— It comes in at 4.1."

"Jobless claims— Much lower than expected." pic.twitter.com/YOqbms679e

— Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) July 3, 2025

• Peer Reviewed Politics^™ Article | Author: @Teapartier_Al on X.com |  Article Attribution: @Teapartier_Al on X.com | BLS.gov | Fox Business - Cheryl Casone | Bloomberg’s Jonathan Ferro | | Article Date: July 09, 2025 | Video Clip Duration: 00:00:00 | Video / Photo Credit:  Video - Fox Business - Cheryl Casone | Bloomberg’s Jonathan Ferro

Is New York Going Communist?

New York: For decades now, the Democrat party has been on a creep toward what they call socialism.  The problem is that you can't have socialism without the heavy hand of communism.  The two go hand in hand.  If anyone tells you different, well they are lying to you.  There is no way to have one without the other.

Socialism is a political and economic system where the means of production and resources are owned or controlled by the state or the community, aiming for equitable distribution of goods and services.  You hear a lot of this same crazy talk from Democrats with their woke analogies.  Communism is a political and economic ideology that aims to create a classless society where the means of production are owned collectively, eliminating private property and wealth disparities.  It seeks to distribute resources based on individual needs rather than profit.

The definitions for socialism and communism, are one being a system and the other being an ideology, and both socialism and communism work hand and hand.  If you don't know this, then you are seriously naive and definitely don't have a clue of what you are taking about.  Both these definitions were taken from the Encyclopedia Britannica and National Geographic Society.  Both communism and socialism have be around for centuries, with communism being around the longest where ideas resembling communism appeared as early as the 4th century verses socialism being around since the 16th century, respectively. Both of these ideas can be traced back to earlier movements and these philosophies were discussed by Greek philosopher Plato, and English statesman, lawyer and philosopher, Thomas More.

Socialism and communism have been around for a very long time, yet there is no place on earth where either one of these movements or philosophies have ever worked.  Today, we get these idiot Democrats who say, well man, no one has ever tried it our way, Democratic socialism is different, man.  When I hear this I just laugh, but when others who have lived under socialism/communism and who have came to the USA to escape these movements and ideologies, these folks don't laugh when they hear this, they actual cringe and ask you if you know what socialism/communism is.

As we stated, there is NO WHERE in the world were communism/socialism has been tried and it has ever worked.  In fact, where its been tried, people end up dying from abuse from the government and/or end up starving to death.  There are countries that still practice communism, but these countries are extremely poor and those governments are abusive toward their inhabitants.  Want proof of it?  You only need look no further than some of these Democrat socialism protest in America, to see the truth.  Remember what we said in that last paragraph, that you get these idiot Democrats who say, "Well man, no one has ever tried it our way, Democrat socialism is different, man."  We've seen and witnesses at some of these protests where people are throwing bricks at buildings, cars, people, and even police.  We have even seen buildings and cars being burned and in one case a person set on fire in a subway, who was sleeping.

Now you might ask how do these bricks or concert blocks get there to these communist/socialist protests?  Fact checkers claim, there is no proof of bricks being brought to protests, or these bricks are at a construction site that are being used, but yet there are pictures and video's of pallets of brick and blocks at these protests, which end up being thrown by these protesters, usually Antifa protesters.  Regardless, if these bricks and/or concert blocks were not staged at the protests, they are still being used by these communist/socialist protesters to do damage to property and/or people in order to make you afraid.

So, Snopes, Lead Stories, MSN, BuzzFeed News, FactCheck.org, PolitiFact, and other fact checkers can you show us where the construction site is at in these videos?

With centuries of knowledge about how socialism/communism works and its disastrous affects, why would the American people ever think that socialism/communism is better than capitalism?  Our only guess is our education system has to be failing.

When we grew up (Generation X and before), were told by our teachers, WWII and Vietnam Veterans, and even our own government would point out the troubling history of communism/socialism to young folks.  Patriotism was wide spread and there was a deep feeling of love, devotion, and a serious feeling of attachment or belonging to greatest country in the world, the USA.  Today, not so much.

We have already discussed and defined how socialism works and how its tied hand in hand with communism.  You really can't have one without the other.  It's also evident over many centuries, leaders who have practice socialism and communism in there countries are abusive toward the people in their country.  You only just need to remember this, socialism is for the people, not the socialist.  You will never see a socialist live in the same conditions that their countrymen are living in.

Now that we have given you just one example out of many that are out there, and letting you know that the fake fact checking sites which are claiming this is not happening, is false, lets now talk about the people who are running for these political positions within government who support socialism and communism and who don't condemn those that use violence at these protest.

There are a lot of Democrat constituents today that will claim, that Democrat politicians they are electing are not communist, but this not true, because politicians like U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders has clearly stated he is a Democratic Socialist.  When Sanders was asked what a Democratic Socialist is, he would not define what a Democratic Socialist is and what it means to be one.

In New York, there is self-proclaimed communist who serves in the 14th congressional district, who really don't know what communism really is and her name is Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC).  AOC is 29 year old woman, who is the youngest woman ever to be elected to Congress.  Its likely she won district by making outlandish promises to her constituents, but when she can't' deliver on her promises, she then accuses others for her failures, just like Bernie Sanders and other communist do.  We should all be working for betterment of this country, not to divide others.

The real difference though between Sanders and AOC, Bernie Sanders has never held a job, but AOC was a waitress and bartender.  Supposedly, AOC attended Boston University, where she double-majored in international relations and economics.  We are not exactly sure how she graduated with honors, considering she is a self-proclaimed communist, but yet she studied economics?  We guess anything is possible these days in our schools.

Anyhow, AOC was re-elected three times and is serving her seventh year in the House of Representatives.  AOC is one the first two female members of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) that were elected to Congress, the other female member is Rashida Habi Tlaib of Michigan.  Democratic Socialist of America (DSA) are headquartered in New York, New York.  Democratic Socialist of America appeared to team up with the Democrat Party around 1995 according to a University of Washington news article, which was done back in 1995.

All of today's Democrats seem support and advocate the progressive platform and agenda, which support the political and economic ideologies that aims to create a classless society where the means of production are owned and controlled by the collectively.  Like the globalist, the Democrat platform supports eliminating private property and favors wealth distribution, expect of course if its their wealth, then not so much.

New York Democrats again have elected another self-proclaimed socialist/communist in the New York primary who's name is Zohran Mamdani, which is planning on running against Mayor Eric Adams, who is now running as Independent, after the Democrat party went after the Mayor Adam's using law-fare.  Zohran Mamdani won the New York City Mayoral Democratic Primary by 12-Points against the former disgrace Mayor Andrew M. Cuomo.

The fact that Zohran Mamdani popular support maybe do to wanting to give away other people's' money, but not his own.  Something Zohran Mamdani lists on his website lists for his platform include:

Creating a bureaucracy called Department of Community Safety for Mental health and crisis response programs.

Zohran Mamdani is pushing a 2% wealth tax on residents earning above $1 million annually.

Zohran Mamdani wants to raise the corporate tax rate to 11.5%.

Zohran Mamdani wants to get rid of fares on city buses.

Fast-tracking more affordable housing developments in New York City.

Increasing code enforcement on Landlords.

Rent freezes for all rent-stabilized tenants.

Zohran Mandani wants to create city-owned grocery stores.

Zohran Mamdani states he wants to raise the corporate tax rate to 11.5% from 8.85%, and with the wealth tax, it's more likely Zohran Mamdani will cause businesses to leave the State of New York, which could cause massive layoff's'.  Zohran Mamdani choosing to get rid on fares on buses, will result in adding more costs to home owners, increasing sales taxes on residents and taxes on businesses, as there are not enough wealthy folks in New York City to cover creating more affordable housing developments, bus fares, and creating more city bureaucracy with mental health programs, crisis response programs and increasing code enforcement.

Rent freezes are likely to cause other issues, where landlords decide the that costs to maintain properties from sales tax increases and the property tax increases to cover the short falls of taxes on wealth tax in order to maintain these new programs, may likely end up causing property owners to sell their real estate causing rents to increase, because there will be lack of housing.

These will be serious issues that will affect wealthy, middle income, and lower income individuals.  This is likely to cause a serious strain on the city's resources, which will result in higher taxes for everyone.  Zohran Mamdani is just another socialist who has never held a private job or run a business, but yet he dictating how is going to run a huge city.

This doesn't even address how Zohran Mandani is planning to create city own bureaucracies by running city-owned grocery stores and then unfairly competing against these privately owned business who are required to pay property and Business and Occupation taxes, but the city-owned store would not be required to pay these taxes.  Its not very likely that these city-owned grocery store(s) will be able to get food any cheaper, but will end up putting serious pressure on privately owned grocery store(s) with unfair competition.  It will like cause private owned grocery stores to close and selling off their properties, resulting in more food deserts and even higher cost for food.

On top of Zohran Mandani thinking he is going to create these city-own grocery stores, Zohran Mamdani thought for some reason that the City of New York was spending $140 million to subsidize private grocery stores.  According to Washington Examiner, Zohran Mamdani misread the city’s webpage, thinking he could just take half of those fictitious funds, which don't actual exist and then use it to build these socialist government grocery stores.  It appears Zohran Mamdani thought wrong and obviously has a reading compensation problem.  Even his supporters and want-to-be administration did not bother to tell Zohran Mamdani that he was wrong about his assumption that there were some pot of money available for him use to build his socialized grocery store(s).  Zohran Mamdani thought he could spend the investments made by private grocery stores.  The Washington Examiner stated that the city has given up about $30 million in tax revenue to help fund this program.  For some reason or another, Zohran Mamdani thought the private money (grocery stores who have invested $140 million of their own money thanks to the FRESH program) was going to be his to spend. Oops we hate when this happens and you find out you made a big mistake.

Another disturbing issue, Zohran Mamdani was asked if he condemn the term “globalize the intifada”, but Zohran Mamdani had refusal to condemn this term, which appears he's likely one of those antisemites too that support a rebellion or uprising against the Jewish state.

Sounds like some fine people you New Yorker's are electing again in New York...

• Peer Reviewed Politics^™ Article | Author: @Teapartier_Al on X.com |  Article Attribution: Washington Examiner - Grocery Stores plan | | Article Date: July 01, 2025 | Video Clip Duration: 00:00:00 | Video / Photo Credit:  Video - Bricks Randomly showing up - Eduardo Corrochio | Snapshot of Zohran Mamdani in a political ad.

CIA States Iran's Nuclear Program Has Been Severely Damaged

Washington D.C.: The CIA released statement today, on Wednesday, June 25, 2025, claiming the “CIA can confirm that a body of credible intelligence indicates Iran’s Nuclear Program has been severely damaged by the recent, targeted strikes.  This includes new intelligence from a historically reliable and accurate source/method that several key Iranian nuclear facilities were destroyed and would have to be rebuilt over the course of years.  CIA continues to collect additional reliably sourced information to keep appropriate decision-makers and oversight bodies fully informed. When possible, we will also provide updates and information to the American public, given the national importance of this matter and in every attempt to provide transparency.”

Even Iran's Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmail Baghaei stated, “Our nuclear installations have been badly damaged, that’s for sure.”

There is no doubt from the Satellite photo's that there is very server damage was done to all of the Nuclear sites in Iran.  We here at Peer Reviewed Politics^™, were able to confirm the extreme damage done to Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant by using before and after pictures where six 13,600 kilogram (30,000lbs) GBU-57A/B Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP) precision-guided bombs were dropped from 3 of the B-2 Sprit Stealth Bombers on the Fordow Enrichment Plant.  There were several massive holes and craters in the mountain.  You can see how the mountain has been flattened out as compared to previous weather photo's of Fordow.

Before Picture - Courtesy NASA

National Centre for the Nuclear Safety System, which operates under Iran’s Atomic Energy Organization stated that there were, “No signs of contamination have been recorded.”

According to the U.S. Air Force a total of seven B-2 bomber flew directly from Whiteman AFB in Michigan directly to Iran.  These bombers were refueled 3 times on the way there and back.  Three other B-2's faked everyone out (media, democrats, and enemy) by flying west towards Guam.

• Peer Reviewed Politics^™ Article | Author:Peer Reviewed Politics^™ |  Article Attribution: Government Press Releases from White House and U.S. Air Force | Peer Reviewed Politics^™ Article Author: @TeaPartier_Al on X.com | Article Date: June 20, 2025 | Video Clip Duration: 00:00:00 | Video / Photo Credit:  B-2 Picture - US Air Force / Link to Maxtor Satellite Photo - MSN.com / NASA - Weather Satellite

Wow, Real Blue Collar Wages Go Through the Roof

Washington D.C.: The largest increase in wages for hourly Blue Collar workers, which has ever seen in any administration in nearly sixty years, just happened in the last five months of the Trump administration.

According to the White House, they are just getting started with pro-growth, pro-prosperity policies that finally put America First.  If this is true, well we should expect an exceptional growth in wages over the next 3 years and 7 months of the Trump administration.  Should this actually happen, well Democrats can expect to lose the mid-term elections and the next general election too.

The Treasury Department reported that Blue-collar workers have seen real wages grow almost two percent in the first five months of President Trump’s second term, which is just plain phenomenal.  If this is what you voted for, well than, you got exactly what you wanted and a lot more.  Peer Review Politics just put up job approval numbers for the President today and they were amazing.  According to three different polls, the Trump administration is got their foot on the gas and they are pulling away from the Democrats last four years of failure.

Secretary of the Treasury, Scott Bessent, said in an interview with the New York Post, “The only other time it has been this high … was during President Trump’s first term.”  In President Trump's first term as President he had extremely good growth and he ended blowing away every single modern day wage growth record.

In a PBS town hall on June 01, 2016, Obama criticized Trump’s promise to bring back jobs to the United States, when talking about manufacturing.  Former President Obama said in the PBS interview, “Well, how exactly are you going to do that?  What exactly are you going to do?  There’s no answer to it.”  Then Obama continued to try to ridicule President Trump, by saying, “He just says, ‘Well, I’m going to negotiate a better deal."  Obama then states jealously, "Well, what, how exactly are you going to negotiate that?  What magic wand do you have?  And usually the answer is, he doesn’t have an answer.”

Obviously, President Trump did have a magic wand.  That magic wand was common sense.  Former President Obama could barely edge out, 1.4% growth during his two terms as president, whereas President Trump was roughly 2.7% over 3 years, then Covid hit.  If Covid would have never hit the United State, Trump's GDP would have been close to 3.45% overall.

President Trump did setup Former President Biden to succeed, but after a year in office, Former President Biden was able to make it look like Obama was running the government again, within the next two years, it started to look like a recession was happening.

The New York Post noted: “Since Richard Nixon in 1969, Trump has been the only president to record positive growth for blue-collar workers in his first five months.  He also achieved 1.3% in his first term … The recovery from a 1.7% decline recorded in Biden’s first five months, as inflation outpaced earnings, suggests a shift in economic conditions for this financially stressed segment of the workforce.”

We here at Peer Review Politics are looking forward to seeing our country get U.S. Citizens back to work and seeing real growth in wages for once in a very long time.  Only the future will tell, and so far that future looks pretty bright right now.

A few words of caution though, the Communist Democrats are not happy, and it appears they will do just about anything to make sure our country fails in order to embarrass our current president.

• Peer Reviewed Politics^™ Article: Peer Reviewed Politics^™ |  Article Attribution: Statistics from the U.S. Treasury | Peer Reviewed Politics^™ Article Author: @TeaPartier_Al on X.com | Article Date: June 20, 2025 | Video Clip Duration: 00:00:00 | Video / Photo Credit:  Department of the Treasury

USAID Official and Three Corporate Executives Plead Guilty to Bribery

District of Maryland: On Thursday, June 12, 2025, the Department of Justice released information on USAID official and three other corporate executives who plead guilty to bribery scheme, which involved over $550 million in Contracts.

Two of these companies admitted to criminal liability for bribery and securities fraud according to the Justice Department.  Four men, one of which is a government contracting officer for the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), and three owners and presidents of companies pleaded guilty for their roles in a bribery scheme that went on for decades.  It involves more that 14 prime contracts that were worth well over $550 million in U.S. taxpayer dollars.  Thanks to DOGE, this information was exposed to authorities and its likely why some Democrat Senators and Representatives like Representative Adam Smith and others have been howling about DOGE.

The following people names were released by the Justice Department who had plead guilty bribery and securities fraud:

Roderick Watson, 57, of Woodstock, Maryland, who worked as a USAID contracting officer, has pleaded guilty to bribery of a public official.

Walter Barnes, 46, of Potomac, Maryland, who was the owner and president of PM Consulting Group LLC doing business as Vistant (Vistant), a certified small business under the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) 8(a) contracting program.  Walter Barnes pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit bribery of a public official and securities fraud.

Darryl Britt, 64, of Myakka City, Florida, who was the owner and president of Apprio, Inc. (Apprio), which is a certified small business under the SBA 8(a) contracting program.  Darryl Britt pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit bribery of a public official.

Paul Young, 62, of Columbia, Maryland, who was the president of a subcontractor to Vistant and Apprio.  Paul Young pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit bribery of a public official.

Apprio and Vistant, both companies which contracted with USAID, have agreed to admit criminal liability and enter into three-year deferred prosecution agreements (DPAs) in connection with criminal information filed on Thursday, June 13, 2025, in the District of Maryland.  Both Apprio and Vistant admitted to authorities to engaging in a conspiracy to commit bribery of a public official and securities fraud.

The Head of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division. Matthew R. Galeotti stated, “The defendants sought to enrich themselves at the expense of American taxpayers through bribery and fraud.  Their scheme violated the public trust by corrupting the federal government’s procurement process.  Anybody who cares about good and effective government should be concerned about the waste, fraud, and abuse in government agencies, including USAID.  Those who engage in bribery schemes to exploit the U.S. Small Business Administration’s vital economic programs for small businesses — whether individuals or corporations acting through them — will be held to account.”

U.S. Attorney Kelly O. Hayes for the District of Maryland said, “Watson was entrusted to serve the interests of the American people — not his own — and his criminal actions for his own personal gain undermine the integrity of our public institutions."  The U.S. Attorney continued to state, “Public trust is a hallmark of our nation’s values, so corruption within a federal government agency is intolerable. This office, along with our law enforcement partners, will continue to pursue and prosecute corruption at every level to ensure accountability and protect public trust.”

“The guilty pleas reflect the FBI’s unwavering commitment to holding accountable all those who abuse the authority and responsibility of public service,” said Assistant Director Joe Perez of the FBI's Criminal Division.  “The actions of the defendants in this scheme serve to erode public trust. The FBI is focused on rebuilding this trust and protecting American taxpayers from corruption through investigations such as these.”

According to court documents, beginning in 2013, Roderick Watson working as a USAID contracting officer, agreed with Darryl Britt to receive bribes in exchange for using Roderick Watson’s influence to award contracts to Apprio.  With Roderick Watson’s help, Apprio could access lucrative federal contracting opportunities through set-asides and sole-source contracts exclusively available to eligible contractors without a competitive bid process.

Vistant was a subcontractor to Apprio on one of the contracts awarded through Roderick Watson’s influence.  After Apprio graduated from the SBA 8(a) program and it was no longer eligible to be a prime contractor in new contracts with USAID under that program, so the scheme shifted, Vistant became the prime contractor and Apprio became the subcontractor on USAID contracts awarded through Roderick Watson’s help between 2018 and 2022.

Darryl Britt and Walter Barnes paid bribes to Roderick Watson. These Bribes were concealed by passing them through Paul Young, who was the president of another subcontractor to Apprio and Vistant.  Darryl Britt and Walter Barnes funneled bribes to Roderick Watson, which included cash, laptops, thousands of dollars in tickets to a suite at an NBA game, a country club wedding, downpayments on two residential mortgages, cellular phones, and jobs for relatives.  The bribes were often concealed through electronic bank transfers falsely listing Roderick Watson on payroll, using incorporated shell companies, and creating false invoices.  Roderick Watson was alleged to have received bribes valued at more than $1 million.

Roderick Watson helped influence the award of contracts to Apprio and Vistant by manipulating the procurement process at USAID using various means, including recommending companies to other USAID decision makers for non-competitive contract awards, disclosing sensitive procurement process information during the bidding process, providing performance evaluations of certain companies to the government agency, and then approving decisions in these contracts.

Apprio and Vistant agreed to resolve concurrently with the Justice Department in its separate Civil False Claims Act investigations relating to the bribery scheme.

The Justice Department reached its resolution with Apprio based on several factors, including Apprio’s credit for clearly accepting responsibility for its criminal conduct, fully cooperating in the investigation and engaging in timely remedial measures.  According to court documents, Apprio agreed that the appropriate criminal penalty based on the law and facts in its case is $51,673,185; however, Apprio also met its burden of establishing an inability to pay the criminal penalty sought.  Based on the Justice Department’s independent analysis, it determined that paying a criminal penalty and civil settlement greater than $500,000 would substantially threaten the continued viability of Apprio. Accordingly, the Justice Department determined that the appropriate resolution of this case is a DPA and a payment of $500,000 in a civil settlement.

The Justice Department reached a resolution with Vistant based on a number of factors, including Vistant’s credit for clearly accepting responsibility for its criminal conduct and cooperating with the investigation.  Vistant also received credit for engaging in timely remedial measures.  Vistant agreed that the appropriate criminal penalty based on the law and facts in its case is $86,407,740.  Vistant also met its burden of establishing an inability to pay the criminal penalty sought.  Based on the Justice Department’s independent analysis, it determined that paying a criminal penalty and civil settlement greater than $100,000 would substantially threaten the continued viability of Vistant. Accordingly, the Justice Department determined that the appropriate resolution of this case is a DPA and a payment of $100,000 in a civil settlement.

Finally, Roderick Watson is scheduled to be sentenced on October 06, 2025.  Roderick Watson faces a maximum penalty of 15 years in prison.  Paul Young is scheduled to be sentenced on September 03, 2025 and he faces a maximum penalty of five years in prison.  Darryl Britt is currently scheduled to be sentenced on July 28, 2025 and he faces a maximum penalty of five years in prison.  Walter Barnes is scheduled to be sentenced on October 14, 2025 and he faces a maximum penalty of five years in prison.

The FBI, USAID-OIG, and IRS-CI are investigating the cases.

The Trial Attorneys Matt Kahn and Brandon Burkart of the Criminal Division’s Fraud Section and Assistant U.S. Attorney Patrick D. Kibbe for the District of Maryland are prosecuting these cases.

• Peer Reviewed Politics^™ Article: Peer Reviewed Politics™ |  Article Attribution: U.S. Department of Justice Press Release | Peer Reviewed Politics^™ Article Author: @TeaPartier_Al on X.com | Article Date: June 13, 2025 | Video Clip Duration: 00:00:00 | Video / Photo Credit: 

L3 technologies Inc. Settles False Claims On Defense Contracts.

Washington D.C.: Today, the Department of Justice released a press release about L3 technologies Inc, which also does business as L3Harris has agreed to pay $62 million to resolve a False Claims Act Allegation arising from the submission of false cost and/or pricing data on Defense contracts for the U.S. Federal Government.

L3 Technologies Inc., a corporation doing business in Utah, which merged with the Harris Corporation on June 19, 2019 has agreed to pay the United States $62 million to settle allegations that its division, Communications System West, violated the False Claims Act (AKA Lincoln's Law)and the Truth in Negotiations Act by knowingly making false statement, submitting and causing the submission of false claims by failing to disclose accurate, current, and complete cost or pricing data for communications equipment being sold to the various government agencies, including DOD, the Air Force, Army, Navy and other agencies.

In other news about L3Harris, the United States may be working with L3Harris to modify a used Qatari government jumbo jet that was given and accepted by the United States Pentagon on Wednesday, May 22, 2025, whereas this could end up becoming the new presidential jet, according to an unknown source who is supposedly familiar with the matter, but wasn't authorized to speak to the media.  We urge the President of the United States not to get involve with this company as they may have other serious internal issues involving other false claim acts with the Federal Aviation Administration.

Qatar Jet that was given to the United States

The FAA has recently had multiple failures with telecommunications equipment at FAA facilities (Newark most recent) and have continued to see additional telecommunication outages.  Lots of this aging telecommunication equipment in these FAA facilities belongs to the L3Harris corporation, which ended up losing the Federal Telecommunications Infrastructure contract with the FAA, which resulted in work force reductions, which left this company with employees who may not have the extensive experience needed to care for the aging equipment in these facilities.

This settlement with the DOJ resulted from a coordinated effort among the Civil Division's Frause Section and U.S. Attorney's office for the District of Utah with the assistance from the Defense Contract Management Agency, the Department of the Air Force, the Department of the Army, the Department of the Navy, and the Special Operation Command.  According to the DOJ these claims resolved by the settlement are allegation only and there has been no determination of liability.

• Peer Reviewed Politics^™ Article: Peer Reviewed Politics^™ |  Article Attribution: U.S. Department of Justice Press Release | Peer Reviewed Politics^™ Article Author: @TeaPartier_Al on X.com | Article Date: May 22, 2025 | Video Clip Duration: 00:00:00 | Video / Photo Credit:  L3 Technologies Logo provided commons.wikimedia.org / Snapshot of Qatar Jet

Democrat Judge Finds Out, 'No One is Above the Law'

Photo provided by FBI Director Kash Patel on X.com

Washington D.C. - Press Release:Democrats look to say that no one is above the law, but when a Democrat finds out that the law does apply to them, well things get real really quick.

On April 18, 2025, Judge Hannah C. Dugan, allegedly committed two crimes; First charge was for Obstructing a legal proceeding of Federal Agency of the United States, SEE 18 U.S.C. § 1505  The second charge against Judge Hannah C. Dugan, was for Concealing an individual to prevent his discovery and arrest, SEE 18 U.S.C. § 1071.  According to the Justice Department, filed federal criminal complaint against Milwaukee County Circuit Court Judge Hannah C. Dugan on April 25, 2025, for her alleged interference with a federal law enforcement operation and unlawful concealment of an individual subject to arrest, (which happened to be an illegal alien).

Judge Hannah C. Dugan who is 65 years old, you would think she would no better, because of her age and she also works as a judge on top of that to violate immigration law.  According to court documents, the charges stem from events occurring on April 18, when members of the Milwaukee office of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Enforcement and Removal Operations (ICE ERO), along with other federal partners from the FBI, DEA, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection, attempted to execute a lawful arrest warrant for Eduardo Flores-Ruiz, a Mexican national, who has previously been removed from the United States, and recently charged in Milwaukee County with multiple counts of domestic abuse-related battery.

Federal agents arrived at the Milwaukee County Courthouse intending to arrest Flores-Ruiz in a public hallway in the court house following his court appearance before Judge Hannah C. Dugan.  Judge Dugan upon learning of the agents’ being presence in the hallway of the court house, Judge Dugan confronted and ordered federal agents to leave the courthouse.  Judge Dugan was made aware of a valid immigration arrest warrant.  Judge Dugan then told agents that they needed a judicial warrant and demanded that they go to the Chief Judge’s office.

According to the affidavit, once the agents were no longer in the vicinity of Judge Dugan's courtroom, Judge Dugan allegedly elected not to conduct the scheduled hearing on Flores-Ruiz’s criminal case, despite the fact that victims of Flores-Ruiz’s offense were present in the court room to testify against Flores-Ruiz’s.  Instead, Judge Dugan personally escorted the alleged criminal and illegal alien Flores-Ruiz and his attorney through a restricted “jury door” exit, which is not typically used by defendants or attorneys.  The jury doorway led to a non-public hallway, through which Flores-Ruiz and his attorney exited from Judge Dugan's courtroom.  The affidavit continued to state as a result of Judge Dugan’s actions, it resulted in Flores-Ruiz temporarily avoiding federal custody.  Flores-Ruiz was ultimately arrested outside the courthouse, following a brief foot pursuit down the street.  These actions put these law enforcement officers at risk.

Judge Dugan was charged with obstruction of proceedings before a department or agency of the United States, which carries a maximum penalty of five years in prison and concealing a person to prevent arrest, which carries a maximum penalty of one year in prison.

Flores-Ruiz was previously deported in 2013 and had reentered the United States unlawfully.  Flores-Ruiz was subject to arrest based on an administrative warrant issued by ICE for immigration violations following his recent criminal charges in Milwaukee County.

On another note, on April 29, 2025, Hannah C. Dugan was suspended by the State Supreme Court's order, Dugan will not be allowed to carry out her responsibilities as a Milwaukee County judge beginning on April 29, 2025, until ordered by the Supreme Court rules differently.  In the two-paragraph order, the State Supreme Court stated in their order, "In the exercise of that constitutional authority and in order to uphold the public confidence in the court of this state during the pendency of the criminal proceeding against Judge Dugan, we conclude on our own motion that it is the public interest that she be temporarily relieved of her official duties."  According to the laws of Wisconsin, Hannah C. Dugan will be able to continue being paid her annual salary of $174,512, while being on administrative leave.

• Attribution: Peer Reviewed Politics^™ | Story Attribution:  Press Release by Justice Department | Peer Reviewed Politics^™ Article Author: @TeaPartier_Al on X.com | Date: April 30, 2025 | Video Clip Duration: 00:00:00 | Photo/Video Credits: Photo of Judge Dugan - FBI Director Kash Patel on X.com

Ex-Judge and Wife were Charged with Federal Crimes by the Justice Department for Tampering with Evidence.

Photo provided by Dona Ana Detention Center

Washington D.C. - Press Release: According to the Department of Justice, an ex-judge and his wife were charged with federal crimes of tampering with evidence and conspiracy to tamper with evidence.

Ex-Judge of Dona Ana County, Jose Luis Cano who is a 67 year old and his wife Nancy Ann Cano, who is 68 years old, were both charged with evidence tampering involving an Tren de Aragua Gangster Illegal Alien named Cristhian Ortega-Lopez who is Venezuelan national, which was illegally residing unlawfully at the Jose "Joel" Cano and his wife Nancy, residence.

Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) initiated the investigation into Cristhian Ortega-Lopez after receiving an anonymous tip that the individual was unlawfully present in the United States and in possession of firearms.

Court documents show that there was subsequent investigation that confirms the defendant illegally entered the United States on Dec. 15, 2023, near Eagle Pass, Texas, and was released shortly thereafter due to overcrowding at the Border Patrol facility.

Evidence uncovered by federal agents reveals that defendant Cristhian Ortega-Lopez had posted multiple photos and videos on social media which shows Cristhian Ortega-Lopez and other illegal aliens handling firearms at a shooting range in Las Cruces, New Mexico.  Among the weapons allegedly pictured were a Sig Sauer P365 handgun, an AR-15 rifle equipped with a suppressor, and other high-powered firearms and ammunition.  Distinctive tattoos confirms Cristhian Ortega-Lopez’s identity in the photos and videos.

The Feds review of Cristhian Ortega-Lopez social media account revealed content suggesting affiliation with Tren de Aragua, including gang-related tattoos, hand gestures, and clothing.  In January 2025, HSI received a tip that Cristhian Ortega-Lopez was unlawfully residing with other illegal aliens at a property in Las Cruces, NM which is owned by Nancy and Ex-Judge Jose Cano.  Jose Cano served as a judge of the Dona Ana County Magistrate Court prior to resigning in March 2025.

Court records show that HSI executed two federal search warrants on Feb. 28, 2025, in conjunction with the investigation, resulting in the arrest of the Ortega-Lopez and multiple associates for illegal possession of firearms and ammunition, and resulted in seizure of four firearms at the property.

Four firearms believed to be in Ortega-Lopez’s possession, along with three of four cell phones, were seized during the investigation.  Ortega-Lopez was permitted to make a phone call during the search prior to being taken to the Doña Ana County Detention Center (DACDC).  Cristhian Ortega-Lopez informed agents that a particular phone he wished to use was not among the devices recovered.

Video calls from DACDC, later showed the Judges wife Nancy Cano holding a black iPhone believed to be Ortega’s fourth phone.  Court documents show that on March 7 Nancy Cano called with Ortega-Lopez with her personal phone but used Ortega-Lopez’s fourth phone to contact a person named “Michelle” via WhatsApp, then facilitated a FaceTime conversation between Michelle and Ortega-Lopez using her personal phone.  In April 20, 2025 call, Nancy Cano and Ortega-Lopez discussed deleting his Facebook account, where he previously shared incriminating content, including gang affiliations and images with firearms.

Court documents show that forensic analysis of the recovered phones revealed messages linked to Ortega-Lopez’s criminal activities, including affiliations with the Tren de Aragua gang and images of Ortega with firearms.

On April 24, Home Land Security Investigation agents executed a subsequent search warrant at the Cano residence to locate Ortega-Lopez’s missing cell phone.  During questioning of the Ex-Judge, Jose Cano admitted to destroying Ortega’s cell phone by smashing it with a hammer approximately five weeks prior, believing it contained incriminating photos and videos of Ortega-Lopez with firearms.  Ex-Judge Jose Cano is being charged with one count of tampering with evidence and Nancy Cano his wife is charged with one count of conspiracy to tamper with evidence.  If convicted, the defendants face a maximum penalty of 20 years in prison, three years of supervised released, and up to a $250,000 fine.  A federal district court judge will determine any sentence after considering the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and other statutory factors.

The illegal alien Ortega-Lopez is being charged with being an unlawful alien in possession of firearms and ammunition, which carries a maximum penalty of 15 years in prison.

• Attribution: Peer Reviewed Politics^™ | Story Attribution:  Press Release by Justice Department | Peer Reviewed Politics^™ Article Author: @TeaPartier_Al on X.com | Date: April 28, 2025 | Video Clip Duration: 00:00:00 | Photo/Video Credits: Photo of Ex Judge Jose Cano and Nancy Cano - Dona Ana Detention Center

Is Your Democrat U.S. Senator or Representative Lying to You?  Yes, They Are!

You are about to get the real skinny of what is happen in our government and its not good.  Since your U.S. Senators, U.S. Representatives and other people on the left have been making false claims about DOGE, Elon Musk and other members of DOGE decided to meet with Bret Baier at Fox New to do an exclusive interview explaining what they are doing and the audits they are performing on government bureaus and agencies.  This interview will give you behind the scenes look at their mission, while discussing their efforts to eliminate waste, fraud and abuse from government and address their critics.

The FOX News interview includes Elon Musk and other members of the Team called 'DOGE', who are business owners and specialist in doing certain types jobs in the business world.  Elon Musk and the other members of DOGE explain what they have been doing, what they have found, and how they are fixing seriously broken government bureaucracies and agencies.  In their interview they give an in-depth view or picture of what has been going on.  Elon Musk explains what their goals are and he stated that they have been meeting that goal every single day so far.

This interview outlines the work being doing and how much progress they have made on fixing a severely broken government, which is riddled with fraud, waste, abuse, and even incompetence, which has almost bankrupted the country.  Elon Musk and others on Team DOGE team have outlined their work that's being done and that they are not cutting Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid, as claimed by the Democrats, but instead fixing the problems within these and other programs in order to save and preserve these programs from serious future cuts that congress has been talking about doing for years now and to protect these programs from going insolvent in the near future.  In fact, Elon Musk believes the work they are doing will likely lead to those who are on Social Security and Medicare getting a pay increase due to the amount of fraud and waste that has been found and has been going on for decades now.

We believe if you are a senior citizen or on disability you should watching and listen to this interview, before listening to any member of Democrat party who is falsify claiming that billionaires are trying to take steal your hard earn money that was put into an account for your retirement.  These men are doing a wonderful job for all of us seniors and the disabled.  If they were not helping out today, it would be very likely Social Security and Medicare would have went broke within the next 5 to 10 years and those who are not retired or disabled as of now, would ended up losing their money as it would have went into a bottomless pit, never to be seen again, virtually ending Social Security and Medicare before these youngsters even had a chance to retire or collect.

These men in DOGE have been called every name in the book from Stalin, Nazi, Fascist, Hitler, White Supremacist, Mussolini and as well as other names.  The list goes on.  For what reason we ask?  Is it for cleaning up Social Security and other government bureaucracies and agencies?  This does sound right, so instead of asking why people are making these false defamatory statements, we should be asking who is pushing narrative of getting people to make these false defamatory statements and pushing people to become violent.  We should look no further than our elected U.S. and State elected representatives, senators, governors and prior presidents and those who have ran for president and vice president.  Here's an example of just one Washington State representative who has been pushing a communists narrative here.

This is something our elected representatives and senators should not be engaged in doing.  If they want to be an activist, then they should not be running for office.  Its all fun and games, until someone gets hurt, and the public has already seen the damage being caused to Tesla dealerships and Tesla vehicle owners.  This type of engagement should be dealt with very severely by our Department of Justice.

We should also be following the money and you will see the payoffs, ripoffs, the fraud and waste in these programs and we will see those who are ripping off the taxpayer.  We also should not be wasting anytime in prosecuting these crimes either.  Former President Joe Biden and his family took money from foriegn nations and hid it quite well, others in congress have been doing insider trading, taking bribes and so on.  They use these agencies and bureaucracies to hide their kick backs they get from others who receive federal grants and money.  Its basically grifting.

Social Security alone had over 9.9 million people that were 125 years old and were activity receiving Social Security benefits while dead.  DOGE has removed all but 2 million of these dead people from Social Security and they plan to have the rest removed within the next week or so.  We are kind of curious who was receiving this money.

There's over 5.5 million illegal aliens that were receiving Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid too.  Most of these alien were registered for Social Security and/or other benefit programs in 2024 and most of them were also registered voters after these illegal aliens were cross reference to the voter roles.

This is not a coincidence either, this is being done purposely in order to replace those that no longer vote as democrats.  The DNC had a plan to win the 2024 election and if they had would have won, you would no longer have any other party that would have been able to challenge the Democrat party.  We here at Peer Reviewed Politics^™ believe that is already is happening here in Washington State and is likely happening in California too.

• Attribution: Peer Reviewed Politics^™ | Story Attribution: Fox News - Interviewer Brett Baier / Peer Reviewed Politics^™ - Web Article | Peer Reviewed Politics^™ Article Author: @TeaPartier_Al on X.com | Date: April 01, 2025 | Video Clip Duration: 00:38:46 | Photo/Video Credits: Video of the DOGE Interview - Fox News Channel

The People have Called for an Impeachment of these Activist Judges and President Trump Agrees

We here at Peer Reviewed Politics^™ did a little studying and digging it to Judge Boasberg's career and the jurisdiction of inferior courts vs. Supreme Court.  Here's what we found, according to the United States Constitution, the Supreme Court has original jurisdiction.  Congress has conferred some limited original jurisdiction in the past for district courts, but they are not supposed to be overstepping their limited powers under Article III, Section 2, Clause 2.

The Supreme Court is the only court that has original jurisdiction, under the constitution.  When the court has original jurisdiction over a case, it means that a party may commence litigation in the Supreme Court in the first instance of a suit, rather than reaching the high court on appeal from an inferior state court or federal district court.

In Section 3 of the Judiciary Act of 1789, congress had granted the inferior district courts some original jurisdiction, SEE 28 U.S.C. § 1251, in suits between a State and citizens of another state, but congress had not authorized actions of assumpsit in such cases or prescribed forms of process for the exercise of original jurisdiction.  Note 28 U.S.C. § 1251(b)(3) inferior courts may have jurisdiction between a state and an alien, but not if its the federal government and an alien.  Basically, inferior courts sustained their jurisdiction and their power to provide forms of process and rules of procedure in the absence of congressional enactments.

Since the Constitution has processes and procedures for illegal immigration, inferior courts can not intervene in telling the executive branch how it can execute the law of the land, Supreme law, or Constitutional law when its already prescribed how executive power may be used for illegal immigration.  If it wasn't mentioned in the Constitution, then the inferior courts would have jurisdiction, as the 10th amendment would apply.  Again, See 28 U.S.C. § 1251(b)(3).

In 1861, Chief Justice Roger Taney had reviewed applicable precedents and he stated that in all cases where the Constitution grants the Supreme Court original jurisdiction, the Supreme Court has authority to exercise it without further acts of Congress to regulate its powers or confer jurisdiction, and that the court may regulate and Mould the process it uses in such manner as in its judgment will best promote the purposes of justice.

According to congress, from the very beginning of the founding of this country, the Supreme Court has indicated that its original jurisdiction flows directly from the Constitution and is therefore self-executing without further action by Congress.  In Chisholm v. Georgia, the Court considered an action of assumpsit against the State of Georgia by a citizen of another state.  Congress in Section 3 of the Judiciary Act of 1789, had granted the inferior Court original jurisdiction in suits between a state and citizens of another state, SEE 2 U.S. (2 Dall.) 419 (1793), but congress had never authorized actions of assumpsit in such cases or prescribed forms of process for the exercise of original jurisdiction.

What this means, yes, your countrymen and women may ask your President to intervene on your behalf to remove a judge for bad behavior, or the President may intervene on his own to ask congress to impeach an activist judge, like Judge James Boasberg, which improperly acted like he had original jurisdiction and the he could act like his inferior district court was an equal to the Executive Branch.

An inferior court is not an equal to the Executive branch according to the Constitution and congress, only the Supreme Court is on equal footing, but in this case, even the Supreme Court would not intervene, because under the Constitution, Congress has the plenary power over immigration and has already set the laws in place and these laws are to be enforced by the executive branch, hence "the President of the United States."  The Supreme Court in the past has describe the power as flowing from the Constitution’s establishment of a federal government and the Executive Branch’s implied Article II foreign affairs power, as sources of federal immigration power.

Under Article I, Section 8, Clause 18, the United States government possesses all the powers incident to a sovereign, including unqualified authority over our nation’s borders and the ability to determine whether foreign nationals may come within its territory.  The Supreme Court has generally recognized and assigned that constitutional power to regulate immigration is the duty of Congress and executive authority is derived from congressional delegations of authority.

Since we don't have open border laws in the United States, there is job requirement for Executive Branch's to protect our borders from invasion, as written in the Constitution, and a requirement to enforce the laws that congress has delegated to the Executive Branch on immigration as well.  This is why former President Biden was in violation of the United States immigration laws, because he did not have the power to open the border illegally, or harbor illegal aliens, and/or give illegal aliens aid and comfort without the consent of congress and the govern, (WeThePeople).  Note: the courts, including the Supreme Court never ever even raised a finger to stop the Biden Administration from their unlawful and illegal actions.  So WeThePeople should be asking why congress and the courts did not enforce the law on Biden administration and we should also be asking congress to hold those in contempt for failing to act.  We should also be starting a process to remove those that failed in their fiduciary duties.

There is some unknown information about Judge James Boasberg that many people may not know about him.  Judge James Boasberg's daughter (Katherine Boasberg) works for a 501c3 called company or "NGO" called “Partners for Justice,” which gives criminal illegal aliens and gang members legal advice.  This is probably why Judge James Boasberg wants those criminal aliens back as his daughters' employer would likely want represent these criminals.

There is also other questionable conduct of Judge James Boasberg, as he played key role in the FISA Court Russia, Russia, Russia case, which used false information from Hillary Clinton's bought and paid for Steele Dossier.  This judge worked as the Chief Justice on the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance court during former President Obama Administration tenure and in 2011, he was nominated to the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia by former President Barack Obama.

This same judge basically let a defendant go who had committed crimes in the FBI’s Crossfire Hurricane team on then 45th President Donald Trump.  This judge was also instrumental in the appointment of officials who had defended the FBI’s actions during the Russiagate, oversaw improvements after the Trump-Russia investigation in how the Justice Department conducts national security surveillance, renewal of the FBI’s FISA powers, and handled his share of sentencing's of J6'er, who were falsely accused of an insurrection on the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.

As for the impeachment of this Judge Boasberg and other activist judges, yes the President does need congress to start an impeachment of a civil official under Article I.  There also needs to be bad behavior under Article II, Section 4, whereas this Judge and other activist judges have shown bad behavior in their inferior courts, by putting our country and citizens at risk by slowing down of constitutional procedures, processes, and ignoring constitutional processes, congressional laws, and have other types of conflicts of interest and bias toward President Trump enforcing the laws as we listed above, all of which are considered to be High Crimes and Misdemeanors under law.  It really appears that these judges are definitely trying to stop President Trump from properly governing this country, which puts us all in danger.

Anyhow, under Article I, Section 2, Clause 5 it grants the sole power of impeachment to the House of Representatives.  Article I,Section 3, Clause 6 assigns the Senate sole responsibility in the trial of impeachments.  Article I, Section 3, Clause 7 provides that the sanctions for an impeached and convicted individual are limited to removal from office and potentially a bar from holding future office, but an impeachment proceeding does not preclude criminal liability.

When Justice Roberts commented on an impeachment of this judge, it definitely made him look like a buffoon and it also made Chief Justice Roberts look like he has some kind of ties to Judge's Boasberg past behavior.  Justice Roberts needs to remember to stay neutral or to step down.  Justice Roberts definitely made the Supreme Court look bad as Supreme court regulates the conduct of these inferior courts.

• Attribution: Peer Reviewed Politics^™ | Story Attribution: Peer Reviewed Politics^™ / The United States Constitution / U.S. Code / U.S. Congress / Constitution Annotated / Time | Peer Reviewed Politics^™ Article Author: @TeaPartier_Al on X.com | Date: March 20, 2025 | Video Clip Duration: 00:00:00 | Photo/Video Credits: Photo of the Senate during a Impeachment Trial - Congress

Attorney General Bondi's Comments on Violent Attacks Against Tesla Property.

Washington DC: The federal government is now taking swift action against these leftist that have been damaging Tesla vehicles, because of their anti-Musk attitudes toward Elon Musk for him helping the U.S. government to do department audits on waste, fraud, and abuse within the United States Government.

This terrorism steams from the Democrat party coaching their constituents to be disorderly and to cause violence against the Elon Musk, government officials, and people who support President Trump, because the Democrat party had lost the Presidential election as well as losing their majorities in the House of Representatives and in the U.S Senate.  Its been nothing short of pushing an insurrection or anarchy on to the United States and voters who elected Conservative leaders into office and those who have Tesla vehicles, which may or may not have voted for President Trump.

These leftist idiots are painting cars with words like "resist", painting building's, throwing Molotov cocktails, crude bombs filled with gasoline, and other types of flammable materials at Tesla vehicles on car lots.  Also these leftist loons have also shot, scratched, and smashed Tesla cars and trucks with guns, keys, hammers, and other objects.

On Tuesday, March 18, 2025, U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi from the U.S. Department of Justice commented on the violent attacks on Tesla properties throughout the United States, “The swarm of violent attacks on Tesla property is nothing short of domestic terrorism.  The Department of Justice has already charged several perpetrators with that in mind, including in cases that involve charges with five-year mandatory minimum sentences.  We will continue investigations that impose severe consequences on those involved in these attacks, including those operating behind the scenes to coordinate and fund these crimes.”

• Attribution: Peer Reviewed Politics^™ | Story Attribution: Peer Reviewed Politics^™ / U.S. Department of Justice - AG Pam Bondi | Peer Reviewed Politics^™ Article Author: @TeaPartier_Al on X.com | Date: March 19, 2025 | Video Clip Duration: 00:00:00 | Photo/Video Credits: Snapshot Photo of Pam Bondi - DOJ / Snapshot of Fire Bomb of a Tesla vehicle on a car lot. / Picture of gunshot into the side of a Tesla vehicle -Tigard Police Department.

Los Zetas Cartel and Former Leaders were Arraigned on Drug Trafficking, Firearm, and Money Laundering Charges

Washington DC: U.S. Department of Justice brought Mexican nationals and former leaders of the Los Zetas cartel to justice on Friday, in Washington, D.C..

According to a press release from the Department of Justice, these Mexican Nationals and former leaders of the Los Zetas cartel were arraigned in Washington, D.C., on charges of engaging in a continuing criminal enterprise, which involved multiple murder conspiracies, conspiring to manufacture, and distribute large quantities of cocaine and marijuana destined for the United States.  Charges included the use of firearms, including even a machine gun, during and in relation to drug trafficking crimes.  Other charges were for conspiring to launder monetary instruments as well.

Court documents named the following men Miguel Trevino Morales, (AKA Z-40, Zeta40, and 40), age 52, and Omar Trevino Morales, (AKA 42 and Z-42), age 48.  These men ascended to the highest level of leadership in Los Zetas, which is a violent cartel comprised of former Mexican military officers that began as an armed militaristic wing of the Gulf Cartel.

Charging documents alleged Miguel Trevino Morales took over the leadership of Los Zetas in October 2012 until his arrest by Mexican authorities in 2013, at which point, his brother, Omar Trevino Morales, allegedly assumed leadership of the cartel until his arrest by Mexican authorities in 2015.  After their arrests, the defendants allegedly renamed Los Zetas to Cartel del Noreste (CDN) and continued to control the cartel, while being incarcerated in Mexico.  Through the date of the fifth superseding indictment, CDN allegedly continued Los Zetas’ criminal drug trafficking activities and acts of violence including murders, assaults, kidnappings, assassinations, and even acts of torture.

On Feb. 20, 2025, the U.S. Department of State designated CDN as a foreign terrorist organization.  A justice department official named Matthew R. Galeotti, who is the head of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division stated, “As alleged, former Zetas cartel leaders Z-40 and Z-42 engaged in conspiracies to kill members of the Mexican government, Mexican citizens, members of rival cartels, members of the Guatemalan government, and Guatemalan drug traffickers.  We will aggressively pursue and bring to justice in the United States violent transnational criminals and leaders of cartels and hold them accountable for the death and violence they have committed here and abroad and for the large amounts of dangerous drugs that devastate our communities.”

“The Criminal Division is dedicated to achieving the Attorney General’s goal of the Total Elimination of Cartels,” said Supervisory Official Matthew R. Galeotti.

Acting Special Agent in Charge Michael Alfonso of ICE Homeland Security Investigations New York said, “As alleged, the defendants represent some of the world’s most vicious cartel leaders, who oversaw Los Zetas’ reign of terror with grotesque impunity and ruthlessness, and a sheer disregard for anything beyond their wealth, power, and control.  Special Agent Michael Alfonso continued to state, “I commend ICE Homeland Security Investigations’ El Dorado Task Force for consistently proving itself as a formidable opponent against cartels intent on causing harm.  We will use whatever means necessary to protect the safety and security of Americans from threats both here and abroad.”

According to the justice department, the defendants are being charged with one count each of continuing a criminal enterprise, conspiracy to distribute five kilograms or more of cocaine and 1,000 kilograms or more of marijuana for importation into the United States, use of a firearm in relation to drug trafficking crimes, and international money laundering conspiracy.  As part of the continuing criminal enterprise count, the defendants are alleged to have engaged in conspiracies to kill members of the Mexican government, Mexican citizens, members of rival cartels, members of the Guatemalan government, and Guatemalan drug traffickers.  Due to the fact that these defendants are being charged with engaging in a continuing criminal enterprise, they will face a maximum penalty of death or life imprisonment.

• Attribution: Peer Reviewed Politics^™ | Story Attribution: Peer Reviewed Politics^™ / U.S. Department of Justice - Office of Public Affairs | Peer Reviewed Politics^™ Article Author: @TeaPartier_Al on X.com | Date: February 24, 2025 | Video Clip Duration: 00:00:00 | Photo/Video Credits: Photo of the department logo- U.S. Department of Justice

USA ditches Zelensky, but England & Europe Welcome Zelensky but are they Ready for War?

News from Washington D.C. and Europe: On March 1, 2025, Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky and President Trump had a meeting in Oval Office with VP Vance and Secretary of State Rubio.  The meeting was uneventful until Zelensky stated that he did not want to sign a contract with the United States to pay back the money Zelensky took from the United States to fight a war with Russia.  President Volodymyr Zelensky refused to sign a contract with the United States using Ukrainian minerals to pay back the United States after agreeing to do so, in a prior meeting with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent.

The White House meeting was basically to be ceremonial in the signing agreement between Ukraine and the United States to pay back the United States for the war cost, using Ukraine's minerals.  This contract was to be signed in front of the media, so Putin would see that Ukraine was agreeing to call cease fire in the war and to show Ukraine was seriously trying negotiate an end of the war with Russia, but this did not end up happening, instead Zelensky had some different idea to renegotiate the contract and he tried to provoke the Vice President and President in front of the media.

In the heated exchange that took place in the oval office started to go South after President Zelensky decided to he wanted to renegotiate the contract and then disrespect the President and Vice President of the United States.  President Zelensky ended up humiliating himself on camera and then getting himself tossed out of the White House.  Below is part of the conversation that took place between President Zelensky, Vice President Vance, and President Trump.

Vice President JD Vance stated that, "The path to peace and the path to prosperity is maybe engaging in diplomacy.  We tried the pathway of Joe Biden, the thumping our chest and pretending that the President of the United States’ words mattered more than the president of the United States’ actions.  What makes America a good country is America engaging in diplomacy. That’s what President Trump is doing."

President Volodymyr Zelensky stated that Putin had occupied various parts of Ukraine in 2014.  Zelensky continued, "During that time, it was President Obama, then President Trump, then President Biden, and now it’s President Trump and he will stop him".  Zelensky complained that during 2014, nobody stopped him and that Putin just occupied and took part of his country.  Zelensky stated that he killed their people.  Zelensky stated, "From 2014 till 2022, the situation was the same—people have been dying on the contact line and nobody stopped him."  Zelensky stated that they had a lot of conversations with Putin, including a bilateral conversation.  Zelensky then stated, "As a new president in 2019, I signed with him a cease-fire deal alongside Macron and Merkel.  All of them told me that he will never go.  We also signed a gas contract with him. But after all of that, he broke the cease-fire. He killed our people, and he didn't exchange prisoners.  We signed the exchange of prisoners, but he didn't do it."  Zelensky then asked V.P. Vance What kind of diplomacy are you speaking about?

V.P. Vance clearly stated to Zelensky, "I’m talking about the kind of diplomacy that’s going to end the destruction of your country.

Zelensky started to responded and V.P. Vance interrupted, "Mr. President, with respect, I think it’s disrespectful for you to come to the Oval Office and try to litigate this in front of the American media.  Right now, you guys are going around and forcing conscripts to the front lines, because you have manpower problems - you should be thanking the president for trying to bring an end to this conflict."

Zelensky then stated to V.P. Vance, "Have you ever been to Ukraine to see what problems we have? Come once."

At this point, the meeting started to become intense.  V.P. Vance responded to President Zelensky, "I’ve actually watched and seen the stories, and I know what happens is you bring people on a propaganda tour, Mr. President. Do you disagree that you've had problems bringing people in your military, and do you think that it’s respectful to come to the Oval Office of the United States of America and attack the administration that is trying to prevent the destruction of your country?"  Clearly, Vice President Vance had enough of the excuses and was not buying what Zelensky was selling and did not like President Zelensky's tone.

Zelensky appeared to be extremely disrespectful to the President, Vice President, the Administration, and the American people.  Zelensky was not wearing a suit and he was wearing an all black outfit with a logo on the left side of the shirt.  Zelensky sat in the Oval office Chair on the edge of it and had both arms folded.  Zelensky would not listen and kept trying to interrupt the Vice President and President.  President Zelensky had a smug look on his face, because he had to listen to what Vice President Vance and President Trump were saying to him in front of the media and it wasn't working as he had planned.

President Zelensky tried to put the United States in his shoes by saying, "First of all, during the war, everybody has problems, even you.  But you have a nice ocean and don’t feel it now.  But you will feel it in the future."  This went over like a bomb exploding in President Zelensky's face.

President Trump interjected, "You don't know that."

President Zelensky stated, "God bless, you will not have war."

President Trump then told Zelensky, "Don’t tell us what we're going to feel.  We're trying to solve a problem."

This was really strange for President Zelensky to even say something like this in the first place and you could tell President Trump was not wanting to wear Zelensky's shoes.  President Trump is correct, we are not in war with Russia.  It also appeared the President Trump seem to know bit more what was going on in the war than President Zelensky was leading on.  You could see that President Trump could tell something was rotting in Ukraine and he wasn't wanting to buy what Zelensky was trying to sell.

President Zelensky tried to object, "I’m not. I’m answering the question that...", that's when President Trump cut off Zelensky and told him, "You’re in no position to dictate what we’re going to feel.  We’re going to feel very good."

Zelensky then said to President Trump, "You are going to feel influenced..."  President Trump again interrupted President Zelensky and stated, "We’re going to feel very good and very strong.  You’re, right now, not in a very good position.  You’ve allowed yourself to be in a very bad position.  Again, President Trump appears to know something about Zelensky by stating, "You’ve allowed yourself to be in a very bad position."  Trump continued, "You don’t have the cards right now with us."  Zelensky continued to argue with the President Trump while he was speaking.  Then President Trump said, "You’re gambling with the lives of millions of people.  You’re gambling with World War Three."  Zelensky continued to talk to talk over President Trump.  President Trump again repeated, "You’re gambling with World War Three, and what you’re doing is very disrespectful to this country that’s backed you far more than a lot of people say they should have."  This appeared to finally shut up President Zelensky.

At this point it looked like President Zelensky knew he was not going to get his way and that the President and Vice President were on to Zelenskys' scam.  Our analyst of this conversation, it appears someone had tried to put President Zelensky up to trying to change the agreement in order to embarrass the President Trump and his administration.  It looked like a setup.

Vice President Vance then asked President Zelensky if he had said thank you once?  President Zelensky said, "A lot of times."  We do remember that Zelensky tried something similar with President Biden when he was in office and Biden became very angry with President Zelensky.

Vice President Vance then said, "No, in this entire meeting, have you said thank you?"  Then Vice President Vance stated, "You went to Pennsylvania and campaigned for the opposition in October."  Vice President Vance meant Zelensky had went to Pennsylvania and campaigned for Vice President Kamala Harris to be President.  Vice President Vance continued, "Offer some words of appreciation for the United States of America and the president who’s trying to save your country?"

This statement by Vice President Vance, seem to bother President Zelensky and Zelensky replied back to VP Vance, "Please, you think that if you will speak very loudly..."

Trump then interrupted President Zelensky and stated, "He is not speaking loudly.  Your country is in big trouble."

President Zelensky look like he got scolded by his parent and said, "I know.  Can I ask..."

President Trump the cut off Zelensky and said, "No, no, you’ve done a lot of talking.  Your country is in big trouble.

President Zelensky said, "I know."

Trump the elaborated, "You’re not winning this.  You have a damn good chance of coming out okay, because of us.

President Zelensky appeared to be beaten down and then he started to change his attitude somewhat by addressing President Trump with respect.  "Mr. President, we are staying strong in our country.  From the very beginning of the war we’ve been alone and we are thankful. I said thank you in this cabinet."

President Trump then clearly stated, "We gave you, through this stupid president, $350 billion.  We gave you military equipment.  Your men are brave but they have used our military equipment.  If you didn’t have our military equipment,  this war would have been over in two weeks."

President Zelensky knew what President Trump was saying and he replied, "In three days, yes.  I heard it from Putin."  So Zelensky knew his country would have be wasted in 3 days, if it wasn't for our old military equipment we provided to Ukraine.

"It’s going to be a very hard thing to do business like this," Trump then said.

Vice President Vance then said, "Just say thank you."  President Zelensky said, "I said thank you, I say thank you to the American people."

Vice President Vance the said, "Accept that there are disagreements, and let’s go litigate those disagreements, rather than trying to fight it out in the American media, when you’re wrong.  We know that you’re wrong."

President Trump then stated to the media, "You see, I think it’s good for the American people to see what’s going on.  I think it’s very important.  That’s why I kept this going so long."  President Trump then started to address President Zelensky again. "You have to be thankful.  You don’t have the cards.  You’re buried there.  Your people are dying.  You’re running low on soldiers.  Listen, you’re running low on soldiers.  It would be a damn good thing.  Then you tell us, “I don’t want to cease fire.  I don’t want to cease fire.”  If you could get a cease-fire right now, I tell you, you take it, so the bullets stop flying and your men stop getting killed."

President Zelensky then again starts going on about getting guarantees again, "Yes, of course I want to stop the war.  But, as I’ve said to you, with guarantees.  Ask our people about the cease-fire, what do they think."  We here at Peer Review Politics believe the Ukraine people would welcome a cease fire at this point.

President Trump said, "That wasn’t me.  That was with a guy named Biden, who was not a smart person.  That was with Obama, who gave you sheets.  I gave you javelins.  I gave you the javelins to take out all those tanks.  Obama gave you sheets.  In fact, the statement is Obama gave sheets and Trump gave javelins.  You got to be more thankful, because, let me tell you, you don’t have the cards.  With us, you have the cards, but without us, you don’t have any cards.  It’ll be a tough deal to make, because the attitudes have to change."

President Trump doesn't draw red lines in the sand and then back down like former President Obama did.  If President Trump says he is going to do something and signs an agreement, you can take it to the bank and count on us being there.  We believe it is in the best interest of Ukraine to get a cease fire and then try to negotiate with President Putin as he has lost quite a few men too.

President Zelensky wasted no time after leaving the White House and going to the U.K. to borrow more money from Europe.  The UK even stated that they would put men on the ground and planes in the air.

Anyhow, all this got us to thinking there is a lot more to this than President Zelensky is leading on and we could see that in how President Trump responded to some of Zelenskys' answers.  It appeared, President Trump knew something was going on, so that inspired us to do some research on Zelensky.  After doing the research we found a few interesting things that main stream media is not reporting on, so we thought it would be nice to share it with our viewers.  In the research we did on President Zelensky, we found out other folks in Ukraine have been trying to get the attention of the United States to provide us with buyer beware statements.

These is a person who worked in the President Zelensky administration found out some interesting information about President Zelensky and our former President Biden.  This person that worked with President Zelensky also shared a belief that President Zelensky may have some very concerning mental health issues.

This person's name Oleksandr (Alexander) Dunbinsky, he was the Ukrainian MP, and was a member of the Verkhovna Rada party.  These members are elected representatives in Ukraine's unicameral parliament and are responsible for making laws and overseeing the government.  These members play a crucial role in shaping the country's policies and addressing national issues.

What was suppose to be of somewhat quick ceremonial meeting and signing at the White House, instead of President Zelensky signing the contract to repay the United States back for the military funding and military equipment that Ukraine received from the United States, President Zelensky decided to renegotiate the contract in front of the media that President Zelensky had already agreed to.  Threw our research we found out that Democrats and RINO (Republican In Name Only) Republicans who hate President Trump had spoke with President Zelensky at a morning breakfast prior to the Oval Office meeting.  These Democrats and RINO's may have coached President Zelensky to renegotiate the terms of the contract in the White House, while front of the Left Wing reporters, so they could generate a narrative against President Trump and his administration to use on the main stream news.

After the ceremonial meeting fell apart, the lapdog media then start attacking President Trump, but what the media failed to realize is on the other side of the world there was a person who watching the ceremonial signing fall apart.  This former Ukrainian MP after watching the meeting at the White House on Friday, he called for the impeachment of President Volodymyr Zelensky in Ukraine following the heated exchange between Zelensky, President Donald Trump, and Vice President JD Vance at the White House.

Alexander Dunbinsky not only called for the impeachment of President Zelensky but accused President Zelensky of having mental health problems and this is why he called for President Zelensky to be impeached after the meeting at the White House.  Alexander Dunbinsky stated that President Zelensky is "Insane" and living in a "Fictitious Reality."  Alexander Dunbinsky raised all other serious questions about Ukraine's leadership during a critical moment in the war, citing President Zelensky of making dangerous decisions that could compromised Ukraine's national security.

Alexander Dunbinsky has called out and criticized President Zelensky's behavior at the World Economic Forum in Davos, pointing out that President Zelensky mental state poses a significant risks to their country.  Alexander Dunbinsky is calling for an immediate medical evaluation and if found to be unstable to be removed from office.  Alexander Dunbinsky is concerned about the country's current military strategy and the problems President Zelensky is causing with international relations.  Now, whether or not if the White House knows about this or not, it sure seemed that President Trump knew something about what maybe the cause of President Zelensky doing what he did on Friday at the White House.

The former Ukrainian MP stated that Ukrainian military could collapse within the next 100 days.  If you will note, President Zelensky did state at the meeting he was aware of what Trump said he would not last two weeks if it wasn't for the United States help and also acknowledged that he also was made aware by President Putin that he would not last three days without the help of the USA.  Dunbinsky argued that the Russian Army currently holds a substantial advantage on the battlefield over Ukraine and that President Zelensky's refusal to cease fire is directly harming Ukraine.

The former PM also challenged the official numbers of Ukrainian soldiers on the battlefield and Dunbinsky stated that the soldier front line is significantly smaller than reported.  Dunbinsky states the actual number of troops is around 300,000 as compared to 880,000 that President Zelensky government is reporting.  Dunbinsky believes these troop numbers are being reported as being higher, in order to secure funding from international allies.

Some information on Alexander Dunbinsky, he was Ukraines PM who was expelled from the Ukrainian government and was accused of of tax evasion and allegations of working with Russian Intelligence.  Kyiv Mayor Vitali Klitschko has also warned of Ukraine sliding toward authoritarianism, because of the prolonged state of martial law and Ukraine no longer having elections.  In November 2023, former PM Dubinsky was arrested on the suspicion of state treason and sentenced to prison.  Alexander Dunbinsky was accused of working for Russian intelligence directorate under a codename of Buratino.  The video explains a little more about the accusations against Zelensky and Bunbinsky.

Alexander Dunbinsky did make another video and stated that he was put in prison on fabricated charges, his alleged crime was for exposing corruption in 2019 involving the Biden family.  Alexander Dunbinsky stated he was labeled as a Russian agent for exposing the Biden Family.  Alexander Dunbinsky stated there are many others for opposing Zelenskys' administration.  The video below explains more about how Zelensky's government is going after their own people for politically motivated charges against Ukrainian citizens.  The media again is not publishing or questioning President Zelensky on any of these videos.

In the next video, Alexander Dunbinsky addresses President Trump and warns him against President Zelensky.  Alexander Dunbinsky stated that is a fact he was retaliated against when he warn and exposed Hunter Biden in 2019 had got millions of dollars off shore schemes.  Alexander Dunbinsky makes it clear that United States congress knows and has admitted that Hunter Biden was taking millions from Ukraine. Alexander Dunbinsky said after warning about this as a law maker and patriot, Biden warn Zelensky government in 2020, he states that Ukraine government charged him with four different crimes, in November 2023, he was arrested by the Ukrainian government with no evidence, no trial, and no investigation.  It appears these were politically motivated charges involving Zelensky and the Biden administration.  The U.S. congress did investigate Hunter Biden and found that he had been taking millions from Ukraine and China.  The video below Alexander Dunbinsky makes accusations against Zelensky and the Biden family.

We believe England and Europe are being misled by President Zelensky.  President Trump needs to be very clear to the UK and Europe that Article 5 will not be imposed by NATO, if the UK and Europe intervene in the war on the behalf of Ukraine against Russia, because the UK and Europe are provoking a war with Russia on the behalf of a NON-NATO nation.

Tonight on March 04, 2025, in President Trump's joint address to congress, he stated that President Zelensky had called today and had apologized to the Trump administration and the American people.  Zelensky now wants to sign the deal.  We believe that if the President and his administration doesn't know about these videos, they should look into what Alexander Dunbinsky is saying.  If the Trump administration does know about these video's and what Alexander Dunbinsky is claiming, then the Trump administration really needs to be careful with President Zelensky and his administration.

• Attribution: Peer Reviewed Politics^™ | Story Attribution: Peer Reviewed Politics^™ / Foriegnpolicy.com - Anusha Rathi, Christina Lu / | Peer Reviewed Politics^™ Article Author: @TeaPartier_Al on X.com | Date: March 04, 2025 | Video Clip Durations: 00:04:52, 00:03:57, 00:01:50, and 00:03:16 | Photo/Video Credits: Videos from foreignpolicy.com, Velocity, Global Pulse, and ET

President Trump Tells Elon Musk to Put the Hammer Down on Government Employees

Washington DC: It appears on Saturday that Elon Musk posted on X.com that President Trump has asked that he notify all federal employees that they will be shortly receiving an e-mail which requests them to fill out a questionnaire.

The Office of Personal Management sent out an e-mail on Saturday evening to employees asking them to answer the following questionnaire in an e-mail:

From: HR

Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2025 6:34 PM

Subject: [EXTERNAL] What did you do last week?

Flagged: Importance: High

Please reply to this email with approximately 5 bullets of what you accomplished last week and cc your manager.

Please do not send any classified information, links, or attachments.

Deadline is this Monday at 11:59pmEST.

(Recipients name and title)

These are some of the responses to DOGE's "What did you do last week", e-mail from OPM:

DOD and DHS ordered the staff to ignore it: "Silliest thing in 40 years," says Pentagon official.  Though, both agencies say they'll respond through a chain of command.

Social Security and HHS, chain of command did take the e-mail seriously, directing workers to list "impactful, mission-critical accomplishments" by Monday's deadline.

CDC and FDA employees were told to wait for further guidance.

Yes, as you can imagine, there was panic today for government workers after being asked by OPM for accountability of what government workers had done during last the week at work.  It appears Elon and the President were serious about it.

Some agencies in the government, took it as a joke, or DOGE being over bearing, while others took it seriously like they should, and other agencies told the worker to ignore a direct order from the President of the United States.  The last time employees disregarded what the President of United States said, on August 5, 1981, then President Ronald Reagan fired 11,359 air-traffic controllers who were striking in violation of a Presidential order for them to return to work.

Seriously, I worked for the government in the Military, you 'NEVER' disregard what the president asks you to do.  If you disagree, you still do what you are told, and you let your superior(s) or the courts address it.  You don't have to listen to an order that is illegal or against the law, but if you are not being told to do something that will get some citizen(s) hurt or killed for no reason, assassination of U.S. Official(s), hurting yourself, or doing something of this magnitude, you are required to follow orders regardless of what you think, otherwise you can resign.

President Trump is trying to clean up the mess, waste, corruption and abuse thats going on in the government and without government workers following a order or regulation that has lawfully and enforceable been given is dereliction of your duties.  In the military, it's punishable under Article 92 violation of or failure to obey a lawful general order or regulation.

As a federal employee you have a duty under § 2635.101 Basic obligation of public service.  Public service is a public trust.  Each employee has a responsibility to the United States Government and its citizens to place loyalty to the Constitution, laws, and ethical principles above private gain.  "This means you are a public servant and your bosses are outlined in the Constitution as being the President of the United State and the citizens of the United States"

This is to ensure that every citizen can have complete confidence in the integrity of the Federal Government, each employee must respect and adhere to the principles of ethical conduct set forth in section (§ 2635.101), as well as the implementing standards contained within this regulation and in any supplemental agency regulations.

If you don't like this or you don't want to follow orders, then just resign.  If you are derelict in your duties, you can be reprimanded and/or fired.  Again, if you don't like being ordered to do something, find another job.

If your boss or department head doesn't like it, they may take up your or their complaint with OPM or other agency head.  If OPM or another agency head determines you must follow the order given, your department head and/or you must comply with the order or face consequences.

We here at Peer Review Politics don't think this is too much to comply with.  In fact, its pretty dang lenient, if you ask us.  As a Systems Analysis at another company I use to work for, I had to document my time, mileage, whereabouts, and short description of the place and work I did in order to comply with mileage logs for my employer.  Government mileage write off's and per diem rates that federal agencies use to reimburse their employees and/or government contractors for lodging and meals and incidental expenses incurred while on official travel within the continental United States are required to provide this information for the IRS.

Come on 5 bullet points and you people are whining?  Heck, you should see my old mileage logs, they look like a journal or a diary.  What a bunch of sheltered babies, these employees must have had over-protective “helicopter” parents who carefully controlled everything they saw, heard, and experienced.  Unbelievable!!!

• Attribution: Peer Reviewed Politics^™ | Story Attribution: Peer Reviewed Politics^™ / U.S. Office of Personal Management e-mail / Elon Musk's X.post | Peer Reviewed Politics^™ Article Author: @TeaPartier_Al on X.com | Date: February 24, 2025 | Video Clip Duration: 00:00:00 | Photo/Video Credits: Photo of OPM Logo- U.S. Office of Personal Management / Elon Musk's X.com post

Wining, Wining, Wining, going on at the White House

Washington DC: It was another busy week at the White House fulfilling wins for the American people.  Some of the wins include:

President Trump has brought home an Marc Fogel, and American citizen who was wrongfully detained in Russia as well as another American detained in Belarus.  This was the tenth and eleventh hostages that were freed, since President Trump has taken office.

President Trump restored a 25% tariff on steel imports and also elevated the tariff to 25% on aluminum imports in order to protect these critical American industries from unfair foreign competition.

President Trump unveiled a plan for fair and reciprocal trade, making it clear to the world that the United States will no longer tolerate being ripped off.

President Trump spoke with Russian President Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in pursuit of finally securing peace.

President Trump hosted Jordan’s King Abdullah II and Crown Prince of Jordan Al-Hussein bin Abdullah, who announced the Kingdom will accept 2,000 sick children from Gaza.

President Trump joined Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi to announce new deals between the two countries on immigration, trade, energy, and artificial intelligence.

The Department of Energy has approved the first liquefied natural gas project since the prior administration banned LNG exports last year.

Hamas has agreed to free the additional Israeli hostages after President Trump declared “all hell is going to break out” if the terrorist group delayed any longer.

Taiwan President Lai Ching-te has pledged to boost its investment in the United States amid President Trump’s tariffs.

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) was able to “clawed back” tens of millions of dollars in taxpayer funds that rogue FEMA officials have been spend to house illegal aliens in luxury hotel in New York City.

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., and Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins were confirmed by the Senate — continuing the Trump Administration’s rapid pace of confirmations.

There were many more wins last week too, which included:

• President Trump declared all foreign policy must be conducted under the President’s direction, ensuring career diplomats reflect the foreign policy of the United States at all times.
• President Trump paused enforcement of the over regulation of American business practices abroad, which negatively impacted the United States national security.
• President Donald J. Trump attended Super Bowl LIX (59) in New Orleans on February 09, 2025, becoming the first sitting President to do so and bringing back tradition of pre-Super Bowl interviews.
• President Trump received his highest ever approval rating in a CBS News poll — with 70% of Americans agreeing he is keeping his promises.
• Illegal border crossings have hit lows not seen in over six decades.
• Hundreds of illegal aliens from Venezuela were repatriated back to their own country and on top of that these illegal aliens were shipped back on Venezuelan-owned planes.
• President Trump shut down the Biden-era “Climate Corps” work program.
• The Trump Administration ordered the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau — the brainchild of Elizabeth Warren, which funneled cash to left-wing advocacy groups — to halt operations.
• U.S. crude oil stockpiles continued to rise, which they have done every week since President Trump took office. So, why is Washington State still charging over $4.30 a gallon for gasoline?
• The Department of Justice filed suit against the State of New York and its elected officials over their willful failure to follow federal immigration law.
• The Environmental Protection Agency canceled tens of millions of dollars in contracts to left-wing advocacy groups and announced an investigation into a scheme by Biden EPA staffers to shield billions of dollars from oversight and accountability.

There were a lot more wins which we did not post.  The problem is most of these blue states are not going to allow these wins in their state and they will do everything to resist.  This is why the people in these blue states need to clean up their blue states or you will all start suffering the consequence of the people elected, while other states start to prosper again.  A good example is the high cost of gasoline in Washington State and California.

• Attribution: Peer Reviewed Politics^™ | Story Attribution: Peer Reviewed Politics^™ / White House News for Last Week | Peer Reviewed Politics^™ Article Author: @TeaPartier_Al on X.com | Date: February 17, 2025 | Video Clip Duration: 00:00:00 | Photo/Video Credits: Snapshot photos from the White House, Photos from en.Wikipedia.com, en.kremlin.ru., flickr.com

U.S. Attorney General Bondi Brings Down the Hammer on NY Governor, Attorney General, and DMV Commissioner.

Washington DC: Today, Wednesday February 12. 2025, in an explosive press conference, the Department of Justice has charged New York Governor Kathy Hochul, New York Attorney General Letitia James, New York Commissioner of the Department of Motor Vehicles Mark Schroeder for violating federal immigration laws by shielding illegal aliens.

U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi announced, "This is a new DOJ and we are taking steps to protect Americans, American citizens, and angel moms, like the mom stand right behind me.  New York has chosen to prioritize illegal aliens over American citizens.  It stops.  It stops today.  As you know we sued Illinois and New York didn't listen, so know you're next."

Commissioner of the New York Department of Motor Vehicles, Mark Schroeder created New York's Green Light laws (AKA Driver's License Act).  This illegal law allows illegal aliens to get a driver's license and register to vote in local elections, which deprives citizens of representation in elections and disfranchises voters.

AG Boni stated that millions of illegal aliens with violent records have flooded our communities bring in violence and deadly drugs with them.  Pam mentioned that the angel mom behind her (Mrs. Tammy Hamilton), had lost her beautiful 20 year old daughter Kayla to an MS13 gang member in July of 2022.  According AG Bondi, Kayla was raped and murdered by this illegal alien.  According to the police, on July 27, 2022, Hamilton's boyfriend found her brutally murdered inside a mobile home in Aberdeen, MD.  Of course, this murder was put unseal, so the public would not find out about it.

Peer Reviewed Politics^™ did some digging and found out the skinny on the illegal alien.  According to the information we obtained, this gang member is a teenager who's an El Salvadoran national named Walter Javier Martinez.  The murder happened in Aberdeen, MD under the watch of Former Governor Larry Hogan who was a term limited governor that year.  The sanctuary state and city policies are to blame for this mom losing her daughter and former Governor Larry Hogan and the Maryland AG have blood on their hands.

The alien was sentence to 70 years in prison and was also given 5 year probation too.  We find this rather disturbing that Alien Walter Javier Martinez would get a 5 year probation period after serving his sentence.  This man should be deported to his home country immediately after being released from prison.

We hope that Attorney General Bondi, puts the full weight of the United States against the prosecution of Governor Kathy, New York Attorney General Letitia James, and DMV Commissioner Mark Schroeder.  Our sympathy and condolences goes out to Tammy Hamilton, her family, and friends of Kayla who lost this young lady do to stupid ass policies of the corrupt Joe Biden and Kamala Harris administration and the idiotic Governor Larry Hogan of Maryland.

• Attribution: Peer Reviewed Politics^™ | Story Attribution: Peer Reviewed Politics^™ / Department of Justice AG Pam Bondi | Peer Reviewed Politics^™ Article Author: @TeaPartier_Al on X.com | Date: February 12, 2025 | Video Clip Duration: 00:14:40 | Photo/Video Credits: Photo of Department of Justice Flag - DOJ

USAID - What Is It, Who Made It, and How It's Been Abused by Democrats and Republicans

Peer Reviewed Politics^™: We are going to talk a little bit about what is USAID and who enacted this program in government and highlight some of the waste and abuse that this program enabled.

What is USAID and How this Become a Government Program

USAID wasn't established by congress as some members of congress would love you all to believe.  We outlined in another article some of the senators who would like you to think they are the ones who created this program.  There are also members in the House of Representative who were a screeching about the program a few days ago acting like this is something congress created and the President Trump could not axe for the misuse of funds and waste, for targeting political opponents, political gain, and some other abuses that we outlined in a previous article, which included an attack on free speech.

USAID is not an AID program, its an Agency for International Development (AID).  Now that you know what it is, we will tell you how it became a government program.  Again congress did not create this program.  This was program was enacted by an Executive Order in 1961 by former President John F. Kennedy.  This agency was established by Kennedy and it was suppose to be an independent U.S. Agency for International Development, during the Cold War.  Its purpose was to counter Soviet activity through foreign assistance, development, and nation building of other countries.  In affect, the agency did as it was intended to do and for reasons like most government programs, but it outlived its purposes of helping end the cold war with the Soviet Union in 1991.

Today, politicians would argue the reason it still exists is because of the threat of Russia and now the influence of China upon the world.  Our politicians will also claim that China has its own worldwide foriegn aid operating around the world countries, which is trying to counter the United States.  Some examples the Democrats would use is Panama, but that argument would fall flat as they were allowing China to take over the Panama canal, also we need to consider what former Democrat President Jimmy Carter, the Democrat Senate and Democrat House had done back in the 1977 in the 95th congress, of course this has all changed since President Trump has shown up on the scene to counter all of this crap from the left-wing ideologies.

A Snippet of History of How the Panama Canal Came About and How it was Given Back

The canal originally was awarded by Colombia to Ferdinand de Lesseps in 1869.  Ferdinand de Lesseps was a French entrepreneur who completed another canal called the Suez Canal.  Ferdinand de Lesseps went bankrupt 1889 trying to build the canal and Ferdinand de Lesseps was bought out by Philippe-Jean Bunau-Varilla approximately 3 years later.

In 1902, after the Spanish-American War the United States purchased Philippe-Jean Bunau-Varillas' French canal company after the United States determined there was a military and economic need to buy the canal.  In 1903, the U.S. Congress signed off on Hay-Herran Treaty with Columbia in exchange for financial compensation from the United States.

Over many years since the original treaty there were complaints by Panama and re-negotiations over the treaty and compensation provided by United States to Panama, which should have never happened.  In 1977, Jimmy Cater signed another treaty on September 7, 1977, which recognized Panama as the territorial sovereign in the Canal Zone, but this treaty did give the United States the right to continue operating the canal, until December 31, 1999.  Congress reluctantly was instrumental in agreeing to this new treaty by just a one vote margin. In December 31, 1999, the United States peacefully turned over the canal to Panama.  You can see the signing of the treaty by going here.  You can also read more on the History.com Website.

How USAID Has Been Abused By Democrats and Republicans

The news broke out about USAID about 5 days ago after Elon Musk's DOGE exposed the abuse at USAID.  According to reports, two top USAID security officials who were forced to come in to work on Sunday and then were put on administrative leave.  Also according to reports, those two top USAID security officials only came in to block DOGE staff from accessing USAID computers.  USAID workers even tried to claim the data was classified.  We're sure after making this claim, that really had DOGE wanting to see what was being hidden from the public.

Supposedly, USAID workers threaten DOGE staff with calling the police on them.  We are sure that would have went over well, sure invite the FBI and the DOJ in, you might as well.  Obviously, the workers don't understand that USAID serves at the Presidents pleasure, as it was created by executive order, and it can be ended anytime by an executive order.

Besides USAID job was to destabilize our foe's, it appears it has been destabilizing media influencers here at home as well.  We found also just out found out journalists like Bill Kristol, politicians like Representative AOC (D-NY), media organizations like Politico, chaos agents like Alexander Vindman, besides the mass murdering bioengineers at Ecohealth Alliance and the Wuhan Lab, Ukraine (the people at Burisma), the Clinton Foundation, and most especially Senator Lindsay Graham (R-SC) were all on the take from USAID as the records show.  All this is still developing as DOGE goes through the documents and files.

Politico is denying they were on the take from USAID and then Axios came out to defend Politico, but then Axios had to make a disclosure that they too were on the take from the FCC.gov.  You just can't make this crap up.  Its extremely bad.

Right Click on image to magnify or open the image up in another window.

We just found out that the New York Times also was on the take as well, without making the needed disclosures as well.  According to updated records, it wasn't 8 million, but it was roughly $34.4 million that Politico had received through so-called highly expensive subscription to the government.  The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and other agencies were subsidizing the Times to a tune of almost $30 million.  Obviously, there's no transparency among thieves.  According to other reports, Politico received $517,855.00 for 37 users subscriptions at the FDA.

Right Click on image to magnify or open the image up in another window.

What happened on Wednesday, February 5, 2025?  An e-mail was sent by Politico stating they can't no longer pay their workers for some odd reason, maybe it's because the US Government just cut off the subscriptions of Politico Pro, eh do you think? 

Right Click on image to magnify or open the image up in another window.

It appears this USAID funding for these media companies was just to push propaganda on to the public by denying the public the real news.  Need proof, how about Hunters Laptop or the Russia, Russia, Russia collusion crap?  Ask yourself what happened their?  How about the intel on President Trump form those 51 security professional?  It was all lies and that is what USAID was designed to do in the cold war.  Obviously, it was effective propaganda program, as the low information voter, latched on to it like a dog with a bone.

As we stated, not only Democrats were involved, Republicans were also involved in USAID fraud and more information continues to come out at a record pace.  As we were writing this story more was coming out on the abuse of this USAID agency and how DOGE is now looking into another program today, which happens to be Medicare (Or what we call Mediscare), this is happen as we were writing this article and some doctors have been just claiming today that they believe there is about $300 billion a year in fraud going on at Medicare.

We ran across this video and we totally agree with the video as it was produced by Mr. Carter, the Host of Apostate Radio, we could never put what Democrats did with USAID funding into better words.  Bravo Sir!

I hereby renounce the Democratic Party pic.twitter.com/bCI7Gq5r3Y

— Isaiah L. Carter 🇺🇸 (@IsaiahLCarter) February 6, 2025

On Wednesday, DODE updated that another subscription and 3 DEI contracts were canceled by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), which will save the taxpayers to the tune of $45 million.  Do you wonder why Politico was doing the bidding of Democrats?

Right Click on image to magnify or open the image up in another window.

Lee Zeldin of New York sent out a X-post formerly known as a tweet to the public that the EPA will not be renewing their subscription to Politico and Politico E&E and that it will be saving taxpayers $458,919 per year.

Right Click on image to magnify or open the image up in another window.

We here at Peer Reviewed Politics^™ can't wait until they start digging into the Federal Trade Commission and other agencies, which some of us have been complaining about for years now.

• Attribution: Peer Reviewed Politics^™ | Story Attribution: Peer Reviewed Politics^™ / USASpending.gov / DOGE / History.com / | Peer Reviewed Politics^™ Article Author: @TeaPartier_Al on X.com | Date: February 06, 2025, Updated on February 13, 2025 | AP Video Clip Duration: 00:01:28 / Mr. Carter Video Clip Duration: 00:03:14 | Photo/Video Credits: Photo of the USAID emblem / USASpending.gov posts / Snapshot of the Axios disclose / AP History Treaty video / Mr. Carter's Video - @IsaiahLCarter on X.com - Host of Apostate Radio

DOGE finds out USAID Program is Not an AID program

Eisenhower Executive Office Building in Washington D.C.: Information obtained by the Office of Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) has been passed along to the White House and DOGE committee about the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) program.  It appears that the USAID program is not really what its called.  According to the White House this is nothing more than a slush fund for government projects that don't actually help the American people or foriegn countries either.  This program has been sold as a fake bill of goods to the American public and thanks to DOGE audit, we now know what its being used to do.  Also, it's M.O. got much worse under the Biden/Harris administration.

It's sure funny how after Elon Musk found out what USAID actually was doing, the amount of money being wasted and then finding out its real purpose did Senators and Representatives come out after Elon Musk, after calling it a criminal agency.  After DOGE called out this USAID as a criminal agency, you all of a sudden see the deep state come out in support and defending USAID.  Some of these senators include U.S. Senator Chris Coons (D-DE.), U.S. Senator Chris Murphy (D-CT), Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH), U.S. Senator Brian Schatz (D-HI), Tim Kaine (D-VA.), Jeff Merkley (D-OR.), Cory Booker (D-NJ), Chris Van Hollen (D-MD.), Tammy Duckworth (D-IL.), Jacky Rosen (D-NV.) and another 31 deep state senators according to Senator Coons.  Senator James Risch (R-ID), the chair of the Senate’s Foreign Relations Committee, objected and blocked the measure and noted hard choices must be made to reduce the national debt.

The Democrats are so mad that even the media lapdogs are losing their minds and posting treasonous posts.

Right click on the image to magnify or to open the image in a new tab.

A White House Memo explains that Secretary of State Marco Rubio was named acting administrator of USAID.  According to the Department of State, Secretary Rubio has contacted Congress stating a "review of USAID’s foreign assistance activities is underway with an eye towards potential reorganization of the agency."

According to Department of State Secretary Marco Rubio, he stated that the “Current foreign assistance processes are severely inefficient and do not substantially benefit the American people.  USAID has numerous conflicting, overlapping, and duplicative functions that it shares with the Department of State.  Additionally, USAID's systems and processes are not well synthesized, integrated, or coordinated, and often result in discord in the foreign policy and foreign relations of the United States.  This undermines the President's ability to carry out foreign relations.”

Secretary Rubio stated, "They're not a global charity, these are taxpayer dollars."  People are asking simple questions.  What are they doing with the money?  We are spending taxpayers' money.  We owe the taxpayers assurances that it furthers our national interest."

The White House outlined the waste and abuse as being:

• $1.5 million to “advance diversity equity and inclusion in Serbia’s workplaces and business communities.”


• $70,000 for production of a “DEI musical” in Ireland.


• $2.5 million for electric vehicles for Vietnam.


• $47,000 for a “transgender opera” in Colombia.


• $32,000 for a “transgender comic book” in Peru.


• $2 million for sex changes and “LGBT activism” in Guatemala.


• $6 million to fund tourism in Egypt.


• Hundreds of thousands of dollars for a non-profit linked to designated terrorist organizations — even AFTER an inspector general launched an investigation.


• Millions to EcoHealth Alliance — which was involved in research at the Wuhan lab.


• “Hundreds of thousands of meals that went to al Qaeda-affiliated fighters in Syria.”


• Funding to print “personalized” contraceptives birth control devices in developing countries.


• Hundreds of millions of dollars to fund “irrigation canals, farming equipment, and even fertilizer used to support the unprecedented poppy cultivation and heroin production in Afghanistan,” benefiting the Taliban.

It doesn't stop here either, according to the White House, the list literally goes on and on — and it has all been happening for decades.  This agency is so bad that USAID even went as far as to run ad on censoring the American people, we kid you not.

The White House explained, USAID has been unaccountable to taxpayers as it funnels massive sums of money to the ridiculous — in many cases, its creates malicious — pet projects for the entrenched bureaucrats, which also censor American citizens with their own tax dollars, and does it with next-to-no oversight, whatsoever.  The White House stated, "Under President Trump, the waste, fraud, and abuse ENDS NOW!"

• Attribution: Peer Reviewed Politics^™ | Story Attribution: Peer Reviewed Politics^™ / White House, US Senators and Secretary of State Marco Rubio | Peer Reviewed Politics^™ Article Author: @TeaPartier_Al on X.com | Date: February 04, 2025, updated on February 05, 2025 | Video Clip(s) Duration: 00:00:00 | Photo/Video Credits: Photo of the USAID emblem and snapshot of a USAID Video / Snapshot of Bill Kristol's post on X.com

President Trump Starts a 10 to 1 Deregulation Initiative

Washington D.C.: President Trump signed an Executive Order on Friday, January 31, 2025, just 11 days after his inauguration to control out of control government regulations.  The last time President Trump did this he was the 45th President of the United States.  He was able to reduce government spending, lowering taxes for We The People, and ended up streamlining government processes, reduced regulations for businesses, reducing the cost of power, it brought in more revenue for the government, it reduced inflation, increased jobs, increased the living wage, and so much more.

President Trumps plan is to reduce 10 government regulations for every new regulation that is created.  We believe congress should not be just examining and getting rid of regulations, but they should be doing the same with laws as well.  We believe congress could go for several years without creating any new regulations or laws and work on reducing and/or reforming the current regulations and laws that we do have, so our government may become more effective and put less burden on We The People and businesses.

This executive order was made to create prosperity within the United States through the process of deregulation and getting rid of burdensome regulations, which not only hurt businesses, but We The People too.  This order requires that for fiscal year 2025, the total incremental cost of all new regulations, including repealed regulations, be significantly less than zero in cost.

President Trump believes that this executive order requiring deregulation for every new regulation put in place will increase jobs and will cut the extreme inflation that Americans have been dealing with since Former President Biden, his administration, and the Democrat controlled congress who pushed a regulatory blitz of new regulations in the first two years of the Biden Administration.  Biden and Congress created a ton of new laws and regulations which created high inflation and slowed growth in the economy, just like the Obama Administration did.

The Biden Administration imposed a historic $1.7 trillion in costs on the American people through their regulations and laws that were created during the Biden Administration from January 20, 2021 to January 20, 2025.  These regulations and laws slowed and/or stopped American entrepreneurship from growing, crushed small business, reduced consumer choices, discouraged new innovation, created record inflation throughout the economy, increased the costs of food, energy and living costs, and it also infringed on the liberties of American citizens.

In President Trumps first term from January 20, 2017 to January 19, 2021, he asked government agencies under Executive Order # 13777, to eliminate two regulations for each one new regulation issued.  The Trump Administration not only reach the 2 for 1 goal, but eliminated five and a half regulations for everyone new regulation issued.

This new executive order in President Trump's second term will build on President Trump’s previous success to improve daily lives of the American people by reducing unnecessary, burdensome, and costly Federal regulations.

• Attribution: Peer Reviewed Politics^™ | Story Attribution: Peer Reviewed Politics^™ / White House Executive Order | Peer Reviewed Politics^™ Article Author: @TeaPartier_Al on X.com | Date: January 31, 2025 | Video Clip(s) Duration: 00:00:00 | Photo/Video Credits: Photograph of Donald Trump - White House.

President Trump was Sworn in to Office and Started Work Right Away

Washington D.C.: Today, President Donald J. Trump was sworn in as the 47th President of the United States in an intimate inauguration ceremony inside the Capital rotunda.  Trump was supposed to be sworn in on two bibles (one that his mother gave him and the another bible is the one that Abraham Lincoln was sworn in with in 1861), but it appears Justice Roberts did not ask President Trump to put his hand on the bibles, prior to President Trump being sworn in Vice President JD Vance was sworn in.

After President Trump was sworn in, he the addressed those at the inauguration stating, "The golden age of America begins now."  President Trump accused the Biden Administration of protecting dangerous criminals by giving illegal aliens sanctuary, protection and comfort.  President Trump said, "all this changes today."

President Trump stated that the Biden administration, "cannot manage even a simple crisis at home."  We here at Peer Reviewed Politics^™ would state that the Biden administration knew exactly what they were doing and it this wasn't just a simple crisis, it was done diligently and deliberately.  President Trump even blasted the Former President Joe Biden and Former Vice President Kamala Harris of their corruption and law fare at the inauguration ceremony.  We bet Biden and Harris felt like a bunch of corrupt jerks.

According to President Trump, Former President Biden issued pre-emptive pardons his family, siblings, Dr.Fauci, and Jan 6 riot panel who committed law fare against President Trump and his supporters who went to the Jan 6, 2021 Presidential election certification at the Capital building.  Obviously Former President Biden, his family, Dr. Fauci and the January 6th select committee had broken the law, otherwise why would they need a blank pardon?  We here at Peer Review Politics have some really big news, but we are going to hold off for a few days to a week before announce this information to the public and the White House.  Believe us, this information will be spectacular and those guilty of crimes against the United States, We the People, and President Trump will be well deserving of it.

President Trump already signed a slew of executive orders and he will be signing 1500 pardons for J6'ers today and some of these were executive orders were signed live on Television at Capital One Arena, today.  After President Trump finishing signing the eight executive orders in the public, he then took the pens used to sign the executive orders and threw them out into the audience.  Here are the list of the eight executive orders that he signed.  We also put a link to the Executive Orders as well:

President Trump signed an executive order that will rescind seventy eight Biden executive orders, actions and memoranda.  The title of this executive order is called:

• "INITIAL Rescissions of Harmful Executive Orders and Actions."

Just click on the underlined link to read it.

President Trump signed an regulatory freeze preventing bureaucrats from issuing any more regulations until the Trump administration has full control of the government.  The title of this executive order is called:

• "Regulatory Freeze Pending Review."

Just click on the underlined link to read it.

President Trump signed a freeze on all federal hiring.  This executive order does not apply to military personnel of the armed forces or to positions related to immigration enforcement, national security, or public safety.  The title of this executive order is called:

• "Hiring Freeze."

Just click on the underlined link to read it.

President Trump signed a requirement for all federal workers to return to full-time, in-person.  The title of this executive order is called:

• "Return to In-Person Work."

Just click on the underlined link to read it.

President Trump signed this executive order which directs agencies to address cost-of-living crisis that is going on in America.  The title of this executive order is called:

• "Delivering Emergency Price Relief for American Families and Defeating the Cost-of-Living Crisis."

Just click on the underlined link to read it.

President Trump signed an executive order that withdraws the United States from the Paris Accord and the second related executive order informs the United Nations of the United States's withdrawal from this climate Treaty/Agreement.  This executive order will alone save the United States over a trillion dollars in the first year.  The title of this executive order is called:

• "Putting America First in International Environmental Agreements."

Just click on the underlined link to read it.

President Trump signed an executive order which directs to the federal government to end the weaponization of government against "We the People" and political adversaries of the previous administration".  The title of this executive order is called:

• "Ending the Weaponization of the Federal Government."

Just click on the underlined link to read it.

President Trump after signing these executive orders at the Capital One Arena, he then went back to the White House Oval Office where he continued to sign a bunch more of executive orders while the doing a Press briefing.  The President then stated that he would be signing pardons for the "J6'er hostages."

It appears that last four years will be washed away like a bad nightmare and that President Trump is very serious about cleaning up the mess that Former President Biden and his administration left behind.  All we can say is "Welcome Back President Trump!  We really missed you!"

• Attribution: Peer Reviewed Politics^™ | Story Attribution: Peer Reviewed Politics^™ / President Trump and his staff | Peer Reviewed Politics^™ Article Author: @TeaPartier_Al on X.com | Date: January 20, 2025 | Video Clip(s) Duration: 00:00:00 | Photo/Video Credits: Photograph of Capital One Arena provided by Allan Smith on X.com / Other photo are snapshots from videos taken of the Capital One Arena event.

President Elect Trump Sentence in Hush Money Case

New York City: Today, New York Supreme Court Justice Juan Merchan sentenced President Elect Trump in the business records case with an unconditional discharge and no penalties were imposed on the President Elect.

Trump will not face any type penalty or charges beyond having a marred legal record with a conviction.  Judge Merchan stated, “It is the legal protections afforded to the office of the president of the United States that are extraordinary, not the occupant.”

The prosecutor who was present at the sentencing hearing was Joshua Steinglass.  Prosecutor Joshua Steinglass stated, that Trump conduct was a direct attack on the rule of law itself.  Our take on this whole case is that Trump was only defending himself in a case were he was maliciously persecuted and it seems that the prosecutor has put himself and New York on a pedestal of some kind for Trump stating he was wrongly accused and that there was law fare in the case against him.

The prosecutor claims that President had made threats of retaliation against the prosecutors office and the judge who wronged him in legal matters.  Well, its a persons right to appeal a case, if the case is determined to be nothing more than law fare and there is prosecutor misconduct, there should be a right to seek damages against those that convicted the person which feels they were wrongly convicted for a crime that they did not commit and that the prosecutor should have known better not to charge them, because the crime was not provable.  Otherwise if our legal system did not have this protection, its very likely we will have out of control courts and prosecutors that will take the law into their own hands when they feel someone like the President Elect is going to seek justice, because he feel he did nothing wrong and did not get a fair trial and that the person(s) who prosecuted him took the law into the own hands or used the law to retaliate against someone that they don't like for a multitude of not legal reasons.

Its almost obvious by the suggestion of the prosecutor claiming the President Elect is going to retaliate against them, that there was real some type of misconduct or law fare that was happening here in this court.  If there were not some issue of law fare happening, then why would the prosecutor, judge, the city, and/or state be worried about retaliation or carry if the person seek his/her legal right to have a review?  This case stinks to the high haven, so we can see why the prosecutor and judge maybe a little worried about this blowing up in their faces, because this case something that prosecutor should have never charged the president elect with and the judge should have thrown it out and because he did not his bias is showing as well.

The President Elect Trump and his attorney were given the right to address the court.  The president elects attorney addressed the court virtually on a computer screen, Todd Blanche disagreed with the prosecutors take on the case.  Blanche stated, “I very, very much disagree with much of what the government just said about this case, about the legitimacy of what happened in this courtroom during this trial, and about President Trump’s conduct fighting this case.” Blanche continued to state that his team would appeal the case.

President Elect Trump, addressed the court virtually on a computer screen in the courtroom, and he stated that it had been a very terrible experience.  Trump continued to state, "I think it has been a tremendous setback for New York and the New York court system.” calling the case a "political witch hunt".

• Attribution: Peer Reviewed Politics^™ | Story Attribution: Peer Reviewed Politics^™ / New York Supreme Court Sentencing Hearing in the hush money case | Peer Reviewed Politics^™ Article Author: @TeaPartier_Al on X.com | Date: January 10, 2025 | Video Clip(s) Duration: 00:00:00 | Photo/Video Credits: Photo is snapshot from a still photography video from CBS

Judge Cannon blocks the final report of DOJ and Special Counsel Jack Smith

Click on the picture of the legal document to open it to read it.

Fort Pierce, Florida: Today, Judge Aileen Cannon addressed a Emergency Motion filed on January 6, 2025 by Defendants Waltine Nauta and Carlos De Oliveira to preclude the release of a Final Report by Special Counsel Jack Smith and the Department of Justice.

The emergency motion was filed to preserve the status quo and it seeks immediate injunctive relief to prevent irreparable injury from a report that Special Counsel Jack Smith and the USAG Merrick B. Garland have planned to release their final report to public before Special Counsel Smith and USAG Merrick B. Garland leave their positions.

Judge Aileen Cannon blocked (TEMPORARILY ENJOINED) Special Counsel Jack Smith and the DOJ from releasing, sharing, or transmitting the Final Report on the DOJ and Special Counsel Smith investigation into President-elect Donald Trump and other parties which includes any drafts of such Report outside the Department of Justice, or otherwise releasing, distributing, conveying, or sharing with anyone outside the Department of Justice any information or conclusions in the Final Report or in drafts thereof.

Judge Aileen Cannon added to the Order that it shall remain in effect until three days after resolution by the Eleventh Circuit of the Emergency Motion, unless the Eleventh Circuit orders otherwise.

President Elect Trump was asked about it, when he was speaking from Maralogo (The Southern White House), and Trump stated “That’s a big story.”

• Attribution: Peer Reviewed Politics^™ | Story Attribution: Peer Reviewed Politics^™ / US District Court Southern District of Florida West Palm Beach Division | Peer Reviewed Politics^™ Article Author: @TeaPartier_Al on X.com | Date: January 07, 2025 | Video Clip(s) Duration: 00:00:00 | Photo/Video Credits: Picture of court legal document

Wikipedia Covering up the Truth about Former President Bill Clinton?

No more donations to @Wikipedia until they start being truthful
pic.twitter.com/3QWJ5NWuEI

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) December 31, 2024

Peer Reviewed Politics^™: Have you ever looked up a subject on-line and then went back later to do more research on that subject and low and behold that information was gone?  We are not talking about news sites like ours, but we are talking about places like on-line dictionaries, encyclopedias, and Wikipedia.

Now, we don't normally see this information disappearing from dictionaries and encyclopedias that often, but in the woke age this is starting to happen more often.  Luckily, some folks like some of the people who do volunteer work here at Peer Reviewed Politics^™ have books to read.

Now as with books, the woke and communist dummies of the world just cant erase history by updating a webpage.  More than these idiots would like to erase history in order to implement their own versions of truth, with books they can't do this.  That's one of the reasons why the woke and communist hate books and want to get rid of books, because they want to control thought.

Well, over at Wikipedia they call themselves the free encyclopedia and they publish articles and materials for the public to research and learn about.  Though over the course of its existence, we would say since the late 1990's, Wikipedia really has been doing a very good job of research and its got a lot worse over the last 16 years.  Its also extremely hard to have citations added to Wikipedia since the late 1990's, because the people who control the encyclopedia pages under a Creative Commons for each subject will not allow others to update or make relevant citations on a subject and they tend to control the page they created.

There was a lot of information that was posted about Bill Clinton on Wikipedia over the years related to his relationship to Jeffrey Epstein.  Jeffrey Epstein was charge with crimes of serial sex trafficking and being a pedophile.  Epstein became a multimillionaire and had a social circle that included extremely wealthy individuals, politicians, and even royalty.

In 2005, Epstein was first accused of sexual abuse in Palm Beach.  A women claimed that her stepdaughter had been raped by Jeffrey Epstein.  The FBI ended up getting involve and more allegations (about 40) came out.  A U.S. attorney/prosecutor started an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and a plea deal 2008 was allowed by the United States Government and then prosecutor was not very happy as Prosecutor Acosta stated that the deal was too lenient and that intelligence officials had told Acosta to back off Epstein.

According to the Miamin Herald in 2018, had investigative reporter who found and identified some 80 people who were sexual abuse by Epstein or his associates.  In 2019, a second criminal case was brought against Epstein whereas Jeffrey Epstein was arrested at New Jersey’s Teterboro Airport in July of 2019 for alleged sex trafficking and he held without bail in Manhattan, NY. 

While being held in custody after being taken off suicide watch, Jeffrey Epstein supposedly committed suicide in jail cell with injuries consistent with being hung.  To this day, people think that Epstein did not kill himself and was murdered in order to protect someone else who also may have abuse young women or children.

Any there was a bunch of information posted on Wikipedia about Bill Clinton, which for some reason has disappeared off the Wikipedia website.  A person named Concerned Citizen who has been doing some investigative journalism has found out that someone work on the Wikipedia articles for Bill Clinton has been deleting information in these Wiki articles which were done on Former President Bill Clinton's in regards to his involvement with Jeffrey Epstein over the years.

Concerned Citizen put together a video, which is roughly about one minute and forty seconds, which shows the deleted information that was removed from Wikipedia.  Elon Musk, a billionaire, who owns X.com (formerly known as Twitter) reposted the Concerned Citizen video in a X-post he did.  Elon Musk stated in his X post, ""No more donations to @Wikipedia until they start being truthful.

We here at Peer Reviewed Politics^™ agree with Mr. Musk & Concerned Citizen, too many people run these so-called truth sites, but fail to actually report the truth, just like the main stream communist media, they push their own narratives and either lie or purposely leave out the truth leaving reader with a false sense of truth and brainwashing on a lot of different subjects that they are trying to control or cover up.  We what to give a big thanks to Elon Musk and Concerned Citizen for caring enough to share this with their reader and the general public.

• Attribution: Peer Reviewed Politics^™ | Story Attribution: Peer Reviewed Politics^™ / Information posted by Concerned Citizen | Peer Reviewed Politics^™ Article Author: @TeaPartier_Al on X.com | Date: December 17, 2024 | Video Clip(s) Duration: 00:01:40 | Photo/Video Credits: Elon Musk on X.com - Repost posted by Concerned Citizen

President Biden making Ridiculous Economic Claim

Washington D.C.: Here we go again, anyone got a match?  Scratch that, the gas in here is kind of getting thick in here, so it might not be a good idea to light a match, because the whole economy might blow up.  Anyhow, President Joe Biden decided to gas light the American public from the Brookings Institute just one more time on December 10, 2024, before he and Kackles leave office for good, while most of the American public are saying, don't let the door hit you where the good lord split you.

While speaking at Brookings, President Biden made more false claims that his economic policies have left the United States better off than he found it four years ago.  Not to nix Christmas or anything like that, but we have to say bah humbug to this stale claim that Sleepy Joe made.  In fact, President Biden had the nerve to say that he hoped that the incoming Trump administration would "preserve and build on" Biden's progress.  This is rich and would be really laughable, if it where not that sad, coming from an administration who has out of control inflation for the last 3 out of 4 years of their term.

On top of kicking senior citizens in the face, before leaving office, his administration approved a 'Cost of Living' (COLA) of 2.5%, then raised the cost of what we call Mediscare (Medicare) 5.9%, while inflation increase another 3.3% for the last 12 months in the U.S. economy.  Lets not talk about a wide open border and President Biden and his administration providing illegal aliens with free rent in 4 and 5 star hotels in New York and other places, including all that free cash, food, vehicles, utilities, health care and those work permits to take U.S. Citizen jobs, while leaving seniors with much higher living cost, veterans force to live on the street, and American citizens paying higher costs for everything, not to mention shelling our more of their tax money to support these illegal aliens, while unemployment has been steadily increasing after our government rigged the unemployment numbers for the last year only to be revised month after month.  Other that the high energy and food cost and wars breaking out around the world, we would say did we leave anything out?

President Biden claimed that his term agenda prioritized investing in infrastructure and manufacturing, but according to the National Association of Manufactures (NAM) statistic there were roughly 12.8 million manufacturing employees in the United States in 2019.  We are not going to provide stats for 2020, because these numbers did drop do to the pandemic, but started to quickly rebound by the end of 2020.  By the end of 2021, there was an average of 12.5 million manufacturing employees in the United States.  Current manufacturing jobs numbers are roughly 12.7 million manufacturing jobs as of 2024.  Most of the jobs came back immediately after the pandemic, but unfavorable conditions and legislation was put into effect by Democrats during the Biden-Harris administration ended up hindering the total number of manufacturing jobs completely coming back.  Today, we are still down roughly 100,000 plus jobs from 2019.  So President Joe Biden is falsely claiming we got back to full employment during his term.

In fact, we are starting to see unemployment (U3) numbers rise again according to the Bureau of Labor statistics.  In November 2024, the U3 unemployment number rose to 4.2% from 4.1% in October of 2024 according to Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.  The President goes on to say, "I know it's been hard for many Americans to see, and I understand it."  Yeah right, its not hard to see when you cant get a job and also its not hard to see if you know where to go to get the real facts and not gas lit by an incompetent President and this lying administration.  Biden continued to say during his speech that when he took over the economy during the financial crisis caused by the pandemic, he ended up transforming it into the "strongest economy in the world."

We are not sure where Joe Biden gets his economic information from, but we assume its from some place in Clown World or maybe from another planet, but it surely is not from planet Earth.  According to Gallup, President Biden and his administration had a job approval rating of 37% in November 2024, one of his lowest approval ratings since taking office.

We believe history will show that President Biden and his administration will take over the top spot of the worst President in the history of the United States and he will go down in history with other bad presidents like Herbert Hover, Barack Obama, and Jim Carter whereas all of these administrations were unable to alleviate widespread joblessness, poverty, inflation, homelessness, and hunger in their country that they were suppose to serve.

• Attribution: Peer Reviewed Politics^™ | Story Attribution: Peer Reviewed Politics^™ / National Association of Manufactures - (NAM) / Bureau of Labor Statistics / Gallup / Epoch Times - Emel Akan / USDebtClock.org | Peer Reviewed Politics^™ Article Author: @TeaPartier_Al on X.com | Date: December 17, 2024 | Video Clip(s) Duration: 00:00:00 | Photo/Video Credits: Video Snapshot of Biden at White House